[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.17019409 [View]
File: 62 KB, 1280x720, 1280_jonah.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17019409

>/lit/ doesn't know about ribbonfarm

>> No.15758938 [View]
File: 62 KB, 1280x720, 1280_jonah.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15758938

>>15758928
How do I know you're <25yo?

>> No.14054384 [View]
File: 62 KB, 1280x720, 1280_jonah.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14054384

>>14050436

>> No.14050246 [View]
File: 62 KB, 1280x720, 1280_jonah.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14050246

>>14048745

>> No.12032278 [View]
File: 62 KB, 1280x720, 1280_jonah.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12032278

>>12032273
Who's talking about happiness or materialism?

>> No.11848192 [View]
File: 62 KB, 1280x720, 1280_jonah.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11848192

>>11848146
You're the complete pleb, you raging idiot. There is a large debate about logic, and if it's normative or descriptive. This is tied in with logical pluralism. Why should an intuinionist accept platonist rationality? Why should we accept existential proofs (even in mathematics)? I mean, fuck, even Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy has a page on logic's normative status. I swear you people are a bunch of halfwits.


See, for example:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-normative/
https://johnmacfarlane.net/normative.pdf
https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/289241

>> No.11673309 [View]
File: 62 KB, 1280x720, 1280_jonah.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11673309

What are some books about fat people?

>> No.11368071 [View]
File: 62 KB, 1280x720, 1280_jonah.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11368071

>>11361047

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]