[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.18490988 [View]
File: 280 KB, 1200x823, jackedaquinas.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18490988

>>18490984
Sorry forgot pic. There is no argument here, anon is mistaken. Evil exists.

/thread, again

>> No.18258337 [View]
File: 280 KB, 1200x823, jackedaquinas.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18258337

>>18257795

>> No.12248365 [View]
File: 229 KB, 1200x823, jackedaquinas.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12248365

>>12246753
Wew, we still arguing. I couldn't sleep well, I had a cat on my chest.

>God would see such things as morally justified and therefore good, right?
Yes we are in agreement bad means subjective suffering. Infants have a different idea of bad than adults. God is not bad. God is good. This is known. And again: I can't tell you what God thinks.

Read Aquinas.

>>12246871
No Jesus did not leave a list of footnotes. He passed his ministry to Peter, who began the tradition of the Church.

>>12247232
You don't know who is in Hell. All of God's creatures are good, and God's mercy is infinite. For all we know Hell is empty.

>> No.12246076 [View]
File: 229 KB, 1200x823, jackedaquinas.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12246076

>>12243874
>literally exists
If satan literally exists, then he is a created being, and therefore good.

Satanists btfo eternally.

>> No.12232449 [View]
File: 229 KB, 1200x823, jackedaquinas.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12232449

>>12231912
Reading it now. It's actually not very extremely difficult, and it's not really meant to be read front to back. It's arranged as a reference, with questions of metaphysics, ethics, sin, nature of God, and so on laid out in categories. You would benefit from reading Aristotle's Organon first, and having Metaphysics on hand. Plotinus is another, and having at least some comprehension of Plato's forms (esp. the form of the good) is necessary I would say. It is very much worth your time.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]