/lit/ - Literature

>>9197758
>Do women know how to read? Like when they read, are they actually processing and understanding information? or do they just sort of know what the words mean, and have memorized how they are supposed to react to those series of words, but that is the extent of it?
Why would they? Honestly, ask yourself this...the answer is no reason at all. Men have evolved to be creative thinkers because of the onus of providing for the family, they evolved to be intelligent and daring as a general rule. There was a biological imperative for this, and it was honed across millions of years.

What did women evolve for? Caring for the established family unit, the rearing of children, and management of their limited social circle. They are gregarious, but petty. They consume, rather than create, and in general both their interests and their abilities, as developed across millions of years of evolution, are oriented towards the use of established ideas, tools, and so forth. This is apparent across all of behavioral psychology, for example, women will become the most ardent of cultist supporters, they enforce the established social dynamic with the heart of a true zealot, they persecute with a belief and barbarity that dwarfs the men in their groups. But do they ever create their own religion? Their own ideas? Almost never, such would go against the fundamental mechanisms of their sex and evolution.

All of this becomes all too clear in today's society, where women enjoy privilege as never before in history but do with it nothing, they invent nothing, create no great art, and pursue very little intellectually save perhaps an interest in the actual unnaturalness of their privilege which they have now perverted into their own brand of 'intellectualism', this is all perfectly in accordance with the limits of their mental estate and suggests cultural correction is secondary to evolutionary forces and natural law.