/lit/ - Literature

>>23233276


Your request is overly unspecific.

If you cannot recognize that Christianity —through Catholicism— is the one true faith, and are more in need of reminding or remodeling than of replenishing or refreshing, and your intellect overponderates in talent over your ethicomorality, read more Christian/Catholical gnostic works in order to ease your way into the same more theistic ones; if the converse is the case, do the converse; afterward, reconcile the two through inversional practice.

>>22845158


Excellent Catholics: gnostic & theistic philosophers & theologians; warchiefs, and artprinces, at their personal best.

Christic reason is a train ticket to one's spiritual imagination, and a boarding pass to one's mystical body.

>>22845158


Catholics: gnostic & theistic philosophers & theologians; warchiefs, and artprinces, at their personal best.

Christic reason is a train ticket to one's spiritual imagination, and a boarding pass to one's mystical body.

>>22311926
>I thought it argued in favour of forgiveness and "turning the other cheek" (i.e., allowing people to do you harm and "rising above it").


Enduring injustice with dignity is not necessarily mutually equivalent with allowing it to occur; patience is a contingent measure, and counts as virtuous only to the extent that it serves faith & good actions.


>What does the new testament say about reacting when someone insults you, takes advantage of you, treats you with disrespect etc?


>“Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword.”

— Gospel of Matthew, 10:34.


Urinate on fiends of the like that give false testimony, and detain them if they retaliate.

>>21753445
>I am not struggling for purpose, I am seeking light and inner peace.

You cannot obtain the one without the other; cardinal purpose implies proactivity, and supplies exactivity: the more one mediates patent darkness —having found ways to make the light enter through the shadowy folds of its latent precursor— the better one coheres in the light.

If you cannot recognize that Christianity —via Catholicism— is the one true faith, and are more in need of reminding or remodeling than replenishing or refreshing, and your intellect overponderates in talent over your ethicomorality, read more Christian/Catholical gnostic works to ease your way into the same more theistic ones; if the converse is the case, do the converse; afterward, reconcile the two through inversional practice.

>>21420415


If you cannot recognize that Christianity —via Catholicism— comprehends Mohammedanism, and is the true faith, that is your own immanent problem of reason, and of faith; however, if you are more in need of reminding or remodeling than of replenishing or refreshing, and your intellect overponderates in talent over your ethicomorality, read more Christian/Catholical gnostic works to ease your way into the same more theistic ones; if the converse is the case, do the converse; afterward, reconcile the two through inversional practice.

>>20547236


Turn to God through Jesus Christ, and continue to correct & better yourself.

The necessity, and imperativity, of war is recognized by one who perpetually overcomes oneself, and discerns this convertive confliction in others; it is a problem of purpose, not one of war itself.

Commission, not submission; syncord, not bondage; flames, not chains.

>>17609789
>They can be superfluous but they are constitutive of the folk culture precisely because of the emergence of the sacred/symbolic (these are simultaneous) that is: unanimity. Foreigners were treated differently in every civilization. Nationalism is a modern notion and has nothing to do with what we are talking about, that is why it can be multiethnical (globally ethnical).
>By natural concurrences I meant ethnical, biological factors. Stop being dishonest for a second.

1. Nationalism is an idea(l), not a notion, and its meaning is not limited to contemporary times; Nationalism is pertinent to the discussion insofar as it is used as an example of opposition to ethnicism/ethnotribalism, and of cultural agency.

2. Sincerely: do you have a "point"?

>This is a proof to you how your accusations of an exclusive inner tendency toward its own culture against jews does not hold.
(Pro)Jews —the Jewish ethnicity— do not have a culture, because they have no cultural agency —you have not refuted, nor addressed, this argument; "Apophatic theosophy, ontology comprehend not universally?" does not constitute a counterargument; you, either: ignore what it means to be projewish —a constitutive memeber of the Jewish ethnicity—, or ignore what culture is —or both.

>Now what is the relevance of insisting on an understanding of the term 'notion' which I pointed to you more than one time what I meant by it?
It is pertinent to my argument —see my previous posts.

>I don't reject Divine Revelation, if you think accepting it is ''delusion'' this just proves my point.
>My employing of theosophical and symbolical forms displaying the esoteric side of the Revelation is a presumption but your ''I discern myself what I accept or not from the Scripture'' is divine guidance (ironically supposing you recognize it insofar as you yourself denied it).
I reitirate: if you believe that the recording, and the positing as benevolent, of the doings, and of the following, of that malevolent, adulterous, deceitful, main character entity featured in the Old Testament, and the flagrant Judaic corruption of the Christian doctrine in certain parts of the New Testament, constitute divine revelation, you are spiritually deficient, and voluntarily delusional —no amount of handwaving, nor putting words in an other's mouth, nor formal/appearential reference, will change this fact.

>It is not notional, it is how the term absorbed its own significance.
Widespread confusion does not alter meaning.

>Pregnostic ignorant basking in one's own internal abundance.

>Gnostic revelation of the reality of the world, and of true life, and provision of the way to escape, of the keys to excellence, and of the door to return to home.

I wonder...

>>16858306
Follow Jesus Christ, and all of your uncertanties will be be resolved, and the truth of their causes made certain for you.

>>16586744
>Jesus Christ is anti judaic...
Indeed --what is your "point"?

>...maybe if you read the new testament you would realize he is a reflection of todays problems, therefore truth.
The New Testament constitutes a Judaized corruption of Christian doctrine; even the books, and chapters, that are relatively less Judaized, such as Apocalypse, and the ones pertaining to Jesus, are marred by Jewish meddling, although these are the ones to which you should refer if you plan on recommending the New Testament to someone.

>>16186429
No; Jesus held a martialist stance in regard to war, viewing it as a counterviolent, and counternatural, means of enacting Justice.

>Perhaps people think that I have come to cast peace upon the world. They do not know that I have come to cast conflicts upon the earth: fire, sword, war.
-- Jesus Christ, Gospel of Thomas, verse sixteen.

>>15301080
>[Contemporary] Christianity strikes me as a functionally feminine religion that encourages weakness and universalism.
1. You are coflating Christianity with judeochristianity.

2. Christianity is a spiritual doctrine, not a religion.

3. Your genderist identitarianism betrays your ethicomoral ignobility, and subsequent ignorance of what universalism consists in.

Constant critical lack, or deficiency, of the noble ethicomoral prerequisite, necessarily leads the motivated volition of the superabundant entity along the path of villainy, by way of satanism/demonism/paganism, toward its destination in Hell.

>>14620188
No; I recommend:

- The Nag Hammadi library.
- "Pistis Sophia".
- The Gospel of Judas.
- The Gospel of Mary Magdalene.
- The Gospel of the Perfect Life.
- The Essene Gospel of Peace.
- The Apocalypse of John.
- "The Book of Two Principles".
- "Mundus Millennialis".

>>14620224
>>14620576
Christianity comprehends, both: the shortcomings of the philosophy of Platonism, and the accuracy of most of its concepts, which concur with Christianity.

Incidentally: why is it that whenever a topic/discussion regarding Christianity is brought up, there is always that one individual who implies that a subscription to (an) aspect/s of Platonist philosophy devalues, or invalidates, Christianity, or a genuinely Christian text? I think that it is because that individual ignores what is Christianity in the first place, and, due to being an unwitting victim of judeochristian indoctrination, cannot fathom the possibility that a genuine Christian may subscribe to an aspect of an idealistic philosophy, or worldview, with which he/she shares affinity.

>>14620595
Judas Iscariot, beside comprehending Jesus Christ's teachings, also came to know, via revelation, the inevitability of the future of the current demiourgic church, and understood the importance of completing his task for the fulfillment of God's plan in collecting all noble souls at the end of the world.

>>14576735
Silence the mind ,detach from external that implies thoughts,emotions everything that isint innermost nature .
There is a point in the heart once you activate it becomes a gateway to divinity.

>>14567614
Very based
personally had satori experiences and came to realize mind,reason can never understand or taste divinity .
To understand god is to realize your innermost nature that lies beneath all false layers of separation.
All paths lead to same destination whether you call it brahman,nothingness, tao it doesnt matter its union without duality just being its utmost purity

>>14556196
>I dont think it is so, from personal experience and point of view from spontaneous liberation,
>Buddhism completely negates it yet the path leads to same destination .
Enlightement/"spontaneous liberation" occurs in both: Christians, and Buddhists, regardless of whether it is attained primarily via: reason, or vision; however, upon receiving God's grace, the former strives to mediate, and optimize, the world, whereas the ethos of the latter is that of resignation into eremetism; hence, for the former, reason serves both: a meditatory, and a mediatory, purpose, whereas for the latter, it serves primarily a meditatory purpose, with its mediation consisting solely in exemplar/metaphorical language.

>I still completely disagree with you on what you said of consuming Gods plentitude .How is that not idiotic? It is the highest knowledge of God with endless practicality.
I wrote that in response to this part of your original post, which indicates that you are either: a spiritual parasite, or, as was later made evident, merely ignore/d what are: belief, faith, and reason:
>no concept,belief ,faith can save you or produce anything transformation of value ,they are meaningless.
If, as you say:
>the work you do is in union with god and therefore far more useful.
Then, by, firstly: having the belief in God, and, secondly: having the faith in the purity of God's grace, that are requisute to trust working within God's plenitude - having reason that is of angelic clarity, inspired by God's grace, only moreso serves to further mediate/clarify one's/the world's connection with God, and to better optimize the world, via: ideas, concepts, and notions, actualized through virtuous work; in this - Christianity excels.

Virtuous work with lacking, or deficient, reason, is suboptimal, just as Buddhism is suboptimal in relation to Christianity.

>>14535631
1. Stop ignoring God.

2. I share the sentiment; one comes to know Jesus as a person closest via the spiritual doctrine that was initiated by him, and directly inspired through his becoming himself in Christ, rather than via the religious canon, or, in this case, via "The New Testament", which reeks of jewish meddling with an initially Christian source; regardless of this, the constant longing for ultimacy & justice that propels Christians is compensed, and introduced, within, zealous judeochristians by the appearence of Jesus Christ himself - through/within visions & dreams - the inspired Love of whom impels them toward virtue, thus countering the deficiency that was/is fomented by the demiourgic church, and saving/helping those clouded noble Souls who need his presence most of all.

>>13235946

THE SACRIFICIAL CONCEPT OF CHRIST DYING FOR THE SINS COMMITTED BY HUMANS, IS A JUDEOCHRISTIAN PERVERSION.

THE JOURNEY OF JESUSCHRIST WAS INTENDED TO RENEW THE VOWS OF THE ORIGINAL ARYAN, CAINITE, ETHOS, WHICH HAD DEGENERATED, AND WAS FADING INTO FORGETFULNESS, WITH THE ULTIMATE PURPOSE OF COLLECTING ALL THE NOBLE ONES AT THE END OF THE WORLD, AND HE NEEDED TO CONQUER DEATH TO ACHIEVE THAT PURPOSE, AS A SYMBOL TO THE WORLD, AND TO CREATE AN ENERGETIC EVENT IN THE AETHER.