/lit/ - Literature

>>17209004
>exercise is better than no exercise for anxiety
>less exercise is better than more exercise for anxiety

Cool looking magazine

Since we only know about Socrates through accounts I'll tally him out. Don't know what you mean by "had [...] philosophy" Philosophy is an act of investigation into wisdom and truth. Who investigated wisdom and truth more thoroughly between Aristotle and Plato and through which are we made more ready to undertake philosophy better through reading? (I think that is a better phrasing of the question. While Aristotle lays his conclusions on the table more readily than Plato, Plato requires more engagement from the reader while also giving us examples of conversations between different schools of thought. Aristotle is useful if you want to eschew the whole 'pondering philosopher' model and jump straight into a realm of study. Plato is more useful if you want a sense of breadth in thought that can help you be more prepared for anomalous circumstances.

>>16737398
Being a Muskfaggot makes you even lower

>>16010274
>Palantir

WOW I LOVE FEDS NOW

GLOWWAVE IS SO AWESOME

YEAH TECH IS COOL AND FUN

CAN'T WAIT TO GET TO MARS

>>15961518

>>15574354
>I'd recommend a book on the philosophy of science to figure out what a theory is you complete baboon.

What book of Dawkins do you recommend?

>

>>11194305
>dumb != unhealthy.

intelligence is nothing more than optimal brain function, dont drink milk as an infant and tell me how smart youll be.

>>11194310
>Evolution is an abstract process, so it doesn't make any judgements.

so its like a religion?

>>11194335
>based hegel

that video together with Darwin, Marx and Fukuyama is nothing more than postmodern anti-intelelctual insanity.

>>11194329
>take you lithium, you forgot your dose this morning.

you have an evolutionary demon, I wont take it personally.

>>9101509
Do you like Wittgenstein?

His early work was a little too 'logical-positivistic' for my taste. But when Tractatus Logico-philosophicus came out in '22, I think he really came into his own, intellectually and artistically. The whole book has an apodictic, analytic tenor, and a new sense of mathematical logic that really gives his theses a big boost. He's been compared to AJ Ayer and GE Moore, but I think Wittgenstein has a far more original, mystical sense of philosophizing.

After his death in '51, his estate released this: Philosophical Investigations, his most accomplished monogram. I think his undisputed masterpiece is his repudiation of the programme set out by the Tractatus -- an argument so convincing, most people probably don't pay attention to the footnotes. But they should, because its not just about the culmination of his philosophical inquiry, or the success of the Analytic school, but it's also a personal statement about the author himself.

Hey, Hilbert!

Try leading the world back into Cantor's Paradise now you stupid bastard!