/lit/ - Literature

>>18579312
None that I care for.

>>18579317
When I started writing my novel I posted in /wg/ but quickly found it to be counterproductive. Usually I will just pop in to offer information on topics I'm interested in, but as I've said above, it got to the point where I'm a bit tired of it. All discussion is fairly superficial and when you've browsed /lit/ daily for any significant period of time it becomes repetitive and stagnant. Especially because the threads are also around the same books and authors. I browse /tv/ and /pol/ because they are regularly fresh, since film/television (which I also love - I almost went into TV and film production after my MA) and politics are constantly changing and generating new topics of discussion, while being balanced out by the kind of repetition that dominates /lit/. I also enjoy /his/, because it's relevant to my amateur interest in history, but it's a slower-moving board and can also be repetitive.

>>18579343
Sure, but I do think something will be done about it eventually. I don't know what. But I'm cautiously confident that literature will survive, even if based only on historical precedent and my faith in the power of the medium.