/lit/ - Literature

>>11531039
But is it right? You are showing a worrying preference to take the moral lowroad by assuming that it is okay to ruin someone's good name and social standing just to maybe confirm whether they may be racist.
If they are not racist in your fair and impartial judgement then what is the upshot? What do you gain that is worth their loss? Was burning down the entire granary worth the one bag of rice you walked out with when the miller offered you more?
What's worse is that people are dynamic. You wouldn't want to be put on trial for saying something dumb about girls when you were 7 years old, as your opinions have likely changed since then, so why assume that an opinion someone holds now (however poor an opinion it is) is set in stone never to be reformed?