/lit/ - Literature

>>18504598
>It's not "the left" that overthrows capitalism, it's the workers
1. this was how the NEW LEFT (which are different from Left or Old Left), substituted economic revolution into a sexual one, which was exploited by capitalists
2. "the workers" haven't done shit yet, in terms of a left wing revolution: it's almost always (I can't think of an exception, maybe you can provide it) made by international bugmen (like Lenin). The intelligentsia does the revolution not the workers.
>Why would American workers in the 1960s tear that up for some communist revolution?
Which is why I said NEW LEFT which, because of post-modernism is totally compatible with capitalism. You seem to be forgetting that these movements also appeared in other European countries (e.g. France)
>Was there was some right-wing force in the 60s resisting capitalism?
If by right-wing you mean third positionist types, that would be the New Right and emerging neo-fascists (in Italy for example there were still terrorist attacks up until the 80's, called Years of Lead, you might've heard of it)
>Some kind of commie son of a bitch?
no
>I think you're making excuses for why you don't want to get a job
I work for the betterment of my ethnic community, not some dirty international jew, who looks to outsource capital from my nation.

>>18065012
kek
>>18065111
>they're winning for now but it won't last.
haha What? They bought Africa (through debt), have Australia in their pockets and are buying ports and other infrastructure in Europe. Not to mention their growing influence in the US.
>The people there have seen them flinch so when they hit a real crisis they'll overthrow them.
can't see that happening
>Rising oceans will flood most of their affluent cities.
do it like the dutch lol. This is a half joke, but, lets be honest, industrial society is unsustaineble and the only way I see for our survival is its absolute end.
>You said it had never been tried.
And I appologise for my first argument; I had forgotten how efficient the chinese are

>>18022178
>I think both sides are retarded.
Le epic centrism or third position?
>But I feel stronger towards stopping a genocide camp
I'm struggling to understand this argument. Is it a reference to the Shoah? Because most alt-right (or whatever stupid dichotomy) don't care enough about it, and/or wouldn't really consider it as a part of their ideology.
>I'm certain people like me wouldn't sit in the face of an army coming for you guys.
who's us? Fascists? NatSocs?
>This should may you re-consider your priorities.
I'm really sorry, but could you make your argument clearer?

>>18007352
>Thomas Mann called Ernst Jünger, who was the only 20th century writer equal to him in mastery of style, "an ice-cold apostle of barbarism".
Took it from here
https://www.deutschland-lese.de/index.php?article_id=1170
Never liked Thomas much; even less now I guess.