/lit/ - Literature

>>13188261
Here's me

Ted diagnoses the problem very well. However, I don't think there is a solution. We've already wrecked biodiversity, forested down nearly entire countries (see Britain and parts of western Europe), and created a society that has been heavily dependent upon technology for the past 3 generations more or less, so much so that a life without it is borderline incomprehensible to the cumbrain consumerist of today. It's best just to get some rural property, try and be relatively self-sufficient, and have a stable family to instill these values in. It is completely unrealistic to have an anti-tech revolution when the world can't even revolt towards the materialistic socialism it is so predisposed towards.
Also I dislike how uncommitted Ted is to anything metaphysical. The role of man in nature at its most profound level ultimately comes down to a question of metaphysics. I would happily see him write something either atheistic or religious, I just want him to have some sort of take on it rather than constantly saying "regardless of one's religious beliefs" when prefacing like half the things he writes.