/lit/ - Literature

>>23223750
You know what, I was curious about this book, but not enough to plane to read it, but you obsessing about it changed my mind. If an asshole is stupid enough to ramble infinitely on this board for years about this book, it must definitely be good, because retards, by definition, can't have good taste, logically. They can only emotionally screech at things they don't seize the quality of
>reeeeeee you can't like this or I'll shit my pants!!!1!!! *autistic noises*
The scholar on the other hand can't bother himself in such time loss, too busy to seek for quality content, open and curious of all things.
Automatic win. This book can only be a masterpiece.

>>18709696
>>18712969
Compelling arguments.