/lit/ - Literature

Unlike economies, cryptocurrencies are a zero- or even negative-sum game. They're all pyramid schemes. Unlike stocks, in order to make money you absolutely have to take money from someone else. There are no exceptions. And good luck trying to nail blockchain to physical commodities, whatever problems blockchain solves, it does not solve the Oracle problem. Oh someone steals your identity and posts it on the blockchain? It's there forever buddy. Someone doxxes you and all your internet history is now easily accessible to the public? Sorry shouldn't have made a tiny mistake. No more privacy guys. The Law is now simply whoever owns the token. And it's all tokens. Everything can be bought or sold, everything. No wonder venture capitalists are so supportive of the idea, it will only make them wealthy beyond anything we presently know about. The more tokens you own the more power and control you have. Monetary policy? Who needs that when you can just pray?

>>19898968
>Einstein never took an IQ test, but his IQ can reasonably be estimated to be a bit under 130
>meme articles will tell you it might be 160ish, but that cannot reliably be assumed due to the fuzzy nature of IQ several standard deviations above the mean
>Ted scored a 136 on a very thorough IQ test when he was in his 50s, in jail, and under harassment by the government, and a 167 on a less thorough one in his early years

>>16117398
>Inoffensive means it's good for society.
where did i say
>inoffensive
>good
>society
and where did i say
>it's good for society
and further still, where did i say
>inoffensive means it's good for society
can you read at all? imagine being this trigged

>>16109162
also obvious projection but that doesnt mean ur wrong

>>15880801
>moronic
>reads fiction
i cant believe you've said these things to me anon! oh no! try one more time

>>15853568
again, nothing you're saying is making any sense. you are just projecting your degeneracy onto everything around you. you have zero control over your body or mind. i want to tell you to seek help, but you are beyond repair.

also please learn to use google you dipshit, she is certainly not under 18

>the apocalypse is coming and you can do nothing about it
>ITS NOT DEFEATISM BECAUSE IM HAPPY ABOUT IT

>>14949375
>hospitals will be overflowing
indeed
>there will not be a huge military presence
there is one. if you're living in the USA/UK/Germany, the military presence isn't as physically manifest nor is it rarely necessary.
>>14949376
>won't acknowledge the negligibility of death stats for non-high-risk groups
Because that's false. Even for non-high-risk groups the flu is at minimum 200x worse than the flu. Plenty of non-elder with blank slate medical records have died, moreover, ignoring them, plenty of people exist with autoimmune disorders, asthma, obesity, etc, which all put you at a heightened risk.
>won't acknowledge human capacity to react
What do you mean?
>won't acknowledge the fucking human immune system functioning as it does
The immune system functioning as it does is precisely why covid-19 is so dangerous. There's a reason why children (0-9 years old) are practically immune.
>when called out reverts to "look, no one has hard data so what do you want from me?!"
I have given hard data. I think you need to look into a shiny surface.

>>14937394
>It's mental illness.
All this term means to you dumb fucking faggots is "anything unwanted".

>'Religion makes people say and do evil things.' Christopher Hitchens.
sweet summer child, fighting dogmatism with dogmatism is the ultimate irony

>>14717559
>Feynam was a pseud tho
Yes Richard Feynamn, the Nobel Prize winner that got the highest scores by a large margin at a national Putnam math competition and the highest entrance exam score at Princeton, was a total pseud. This is your brain after spending too much time on /lit/. There is no hope for you, you are brain-dead beyond repair.

>>14698410
>Sam isn't being ironic,
Notice how I said post-ironic. The fact that you think he's not being ironic only confirms this.

>>14696760
>mri scans have proven

God I love this new /lit/ christcuck fad of
>man cannot call that which lives outside of existence evil
It really reveals who the brainlet christcucks are

Yes, you are right OP, it is a veiled
>might makes right
argument, the veil is to ambiguously feign a sort of amorality within the confines of the universe to gaslight you into thinking evil both can't be applied to God and is then necessarily a useless term without Him. but without actually making any sort of real argument in the process other than "durr he no be in universe derfore we have no idear"