/lit/ - Literature

>>11469243
He paints Hitler as a man who tried to introduce his own existential chaos into the world, despite the massive setbacks to his own demands. It's dangerous because it dissociates Hitler with Nazism, and Nazism from being a coherent ideology with tangible goals. But this was never the case, the Holocaust was an incredibly profitable venture, so much even that Germans were the second-best fed population in the entire world, not just from the Jewish assets, but the reduction in the European population, and the deliberate famines and economic crises in European nations. The destruction of the Jews WAS the net benefit in itself according to National-Socialism, who targeted Judeo-Bolshevism, the idea that Bolshevism was the absolute state of what the Nazis called Jewry. The invasion of the Benelux for example, was justified by the idea that eventually the Jewish-Bolshevists would come down to western-Europe, and Russia was directly targeting Europe when it was sucking up countries in Eastern-Europe.needed to be stopped by the Nazis. When Hitler attacked Russia, considered the beginning of the end, it was an attempt to destroy the Jewish-Bolshevist state, but also to obtain gasoline that Germany was running out of and would make them lose the war. Russia had recently purged its generals, and the Russian economy was in shambles, so the US and UK had to fund the Russian war effort to the point of practically funding the entire participation of Russia in the war against Germany.