/lit/ - Literature

>>23109941

Is he keyed?

>Christianity is a life-denying, feminine religion for weaklings and pacifists
>Islam is a life-affirming, masculine religion for passionate conquerors

Why did he think this?

"Hurr durr nietzche is acshually leftist"
>Genealogy of Morals Essay 1 Ch.5
>With regard to our problem, which can justifiably be called a quiet
problem and fastidiously addresses itself to only a few ears, it is of no little interest to discover that, in these words and roots which denote ‘good’,
we can often detect the main nuance which made the noble feel they were
men of higher rank. True, in most cases they might give themselves
names which simply show superiority of power (such as ‘the mighty’, ‘the
masters’, ‘the commanders’) or the most visible sign of this superiority,
such as ‘the rich’, ‘the propertied’ (that is the meaning of arya; and the
equivalent in Iranian and Slavic). But the names also show a typical character trait: and this is what concerns us here. For example, they call themselves ‘the truthful’: led by the Greek aristocracy, whose mouthpiece is
the Megarian poet Theognis.10 The word used specifically for this
purpose, e0sqlov,
11 means, according to its root, one who is, who has
reality, who really exists and is true; then, with a subjective transformation, it becomes the slogan and catch-phrase of the aristocracy and is
completely assimilated with the sense of ‘aristocratic’, in contrast to the
deceitful common man, as taken and shown by Theognis, – until, finally,
with the decline of the aristocracy, the word remains as a term for spiritual noblesse, and, as it were, ripens and sweetens. Cowardice is underlined
in the word xaxo/v,
12 as in deilo/v13 (the plebeian in contrast to the
a0gaqo/v): perhaps this gives a clue as to where we should look for the etymological derivation of the ambiguous term a0gaqo/v.
14 In the Latin word
malus15 (to which I juxtapose me/lav)
16 the common man could be characterized as the dark-skinned and especially the dark-haired man (‘hic
niger est –’),17 as the pre-Aryan occupant of Italian soil who could most
easily be distinguished from the blond race which had become dominant,
namely the Aryan conquering race, by its colour; at any rate, I have found
exactly the same with Gaelic peoples, – fin (for example in Fin-gal), the
word designating the aristocracy and finally the good, noble, pure, was
originally a blond person in contrast to the dark-skinned, dark-haired
native inhabitants. By the way, the Celts were a completely blond race; it
is wrong to connect those traces of an essentially dark-haired population,
which can be seen on carefully prepared ethnological maps in Germany with any Celtic descent and mixing of blood in such a connection, as
Virchow does: it is more a case of the pre-Aryan population of Germany
emerging at these points.

>1/2

>>17167360
>>17167374
Your God does not exist.

>>17141376
1. acknowledge that our urge for meaning is to help us deal with that impossibility of true immortality
2. acknowledge that our urge for immortality is to help us deal with our fear of death
3. acknowledge that our fear of death is pure biological programming

If it is all biological programming, you may consciously choose something "meaningful" and satiate the desire. Do not think of it as a catch-22. Think of it like sex with a condom. Our bodies drive us to fuck and reproduce. We put off a condom and the body is tricked. We know consciously that we will not make a baby, and the body does not care. We must compartmentalize our minds in the same way. Place a condom on your life lie/causa sui/vital lie, then you are free of its destructive power (remember the thesis that these lies are the causes of all human conflict). The quest for immortality through fame is an obvious example of a life lie that can easily ruin you

>>17110454

>>14272012
What a pedantic way to say lit from ancient Greeks. Flagrant verbosity shows how much of a cretin you are.

is it true? do people really want to be lied to? are all words hollow?
spoiler yes

>>13974134
>Simply throwing away a value is not Overman.
It is. And they didn't throw away just one. They did all three, throwed away noxious ones, kept those that were good and master-like. And created new ones. They did the whole package as per 101 übermensch. Your unfunny comical examples won't erase this fact.

>The Overman, is a new being. Someone who is literally incapable of nihilism because he no longer denies life, whose Genealogy of thought is not the spirit of revenge.
Not even my jewish philosophy professor could deny to my face that the NS were vitalists, you are trying way too hard.
The NS accepted life and put their will to work to bend reality to their wants, a nihilist wouldn't have given a fuck about all the things the NS did, a nihilist would've done nothing. The NS are the absolute opposite of the nihilists, they actively changed their country's way greatly, a great turning point. They cared so much about life that they wanted to fix it right there and right then, giving no fucks about mainstream christian morality. A will untainted by the ruling slave-morality (christian), is that not übermensch-like?

Spirit of revenge? The jews needed to be dealt with anyway, they are not needed and noxious, same as gypsies. Did they put gypsies in labor camps as some sort of revenge too? That's how weak that argument is. Germany is for the german people, and weak and inferior influences from other peoples are not needed, they are harmful as Wagner said in regards to the musical scene of the period.

Anyway now that your skin color is revealed I see you have an irrational drive to deny all this because it's a personal matter so I won't bother myself with further replies. Enjoy the cope if you so much require it.