[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.11595677 [View]
File: 24 KB, 170x226, 170px-Unabomber-sketch.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11595677

>>11595658
This. Either go full Unabomber or quite your bitching.

>> No.11467314 [View]
File: 24 KB, 170x226, 170px-Unabomber-sketch.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11467314

>>11467104
We must destroy the system!

>> No.11121992 [View]
File: 24 KB, 170x226, 170px-Unabomber-sketch.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11121992

>>11115889
I can't hep but feel a frightening admiration for acts of terrorism. It requires an extraordinary conviction to crash an airplane into the World Trade Center or blow yourself up on a bus for altruistic and religious reasons, knowing they will die in the process. In WWII, there were thousands of Japanese citizens who volunteered to be kamikaze fighters, all of which wanted to fight for their honor, country, and emperor, and they knew what they were getting themselves into. Yet, we as westerners, say their culture was fucked up, but who in the West can honestly say they have that kind of conviction? I feel if the West doesn't get out of its rut of nihilistic cultural decadence, it will submit to these violent, radical, altruistic, yet virtuous foreign invaders.

The reason Ted Kaczynski killed people wasn't as a revolt against the U.S. government, but as a means to force the press to publish his essay, Industrial Society and It's Future. I can not support violence to strong arm the publication of a treatise, and killing in general (Go away FBI. Shoo! Shoo!), but on the other hand, the problem of technological progress would have never made it to the forefront of public discourse if he didn't commit those acts. Nobody in the media wants to talk about it. Ever. If it weren't for Ted, Ellul would have been a forgotten nobody. Yet, ISaIF remains as a footnote to the Unabomber, and any mention of it is written off as a manifesto written by a deranged radical madman. But a couple prison psychologists found Ted to be of sound mind. He knew a little violence was necessary to bring these problems to light, but he was still mocked in the end. How much violence is required reverse or delay the solidification of the System's control?

I don't believe Ted and the Al-Qaeda terrorists were insane. Osama Bin Laden's Letter to America and Kaczynski's ISaIF are well thought out and articulated indictments against modern western society. They are completely unlike the Columbine kids who killed out of depression and revenge.

For the record, I do not support acts of terrorism. (I told you to get out, FBI!)

>> No.10758091 [View]
File: 24 KB, 170x226, 170px-Unabomber-sketch.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10758091

>>10757849
It's not that simple. You have to go full Unabomber.

>> No.9889784 [View]
File: 24 KB, 170x226, 170px-Unabomber-sketch.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9889784

>>9886319
>>9886366
>>9886406
The internet was a mistake.

>> No.8986174 [View]
File: 24 KB, 170x226, 170px-Unabomber-sketch.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8986174

Any recommendations for essential /manifesto core/?

>> No.3852266 [View]
File: 24 KB, 170x226, mysterious polish philosopher.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3852266

One day.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]