/lit/ - Literature

>>11245071
wew. this passes for philosophy?

>>11103178
>There's no such thing as good or bad when it comes to literature.

>>10736007
>>10736291
>our current society is "basically" a caste system based on genetic engineering
ok

>>9429141
>>9429145
So, we were talking about whether depth is the same thing as quality, you claimed that all depth is "concealing," now you're basically saying that all depth is artificial as well as muddling. If "truth" is always on the surface, wouldn't you want it to be apparent immediately, rather than being filtered through the supposed muddiness of "depth"? And if this is the case, quality is, in fact, the *lack* of depth. That is, if "truth" is something to be striven for. This is all according to your train of logic.

>>9370240
Are you referring to Stalinism? I was talking about the philosophy that was propagated during the formation of the USSR.

>>31452
>I've never even read Stirner
>let me proceed to make a judgment on him anyway using idiots spouting memes as a basis
t. brainlet

>>9172619
>claims to be studying "chinese"
>doesn't specify the branches

lying pleb gwailo detected

>>9107449
ruse detected