/lit/ - Literature

>>15013211
>That's true of bourgeois trans people
i.e. the leadership. Until we see an actual schism between the two, there's no point.
You're also ignoring the fact the overwhelming majority of them are self-id, not gender dysphoric. There's a reason for that. That style of thought is a bulwark of liberalism.

>Leftcom is a self-contradictory corruption of historical materialism
You misunderstand. Necessity does not imply inevitability, either of communism, or of anything else. World-history is that which makes a crisis irrefutable. Necessity. The point is not that to reach Rhodes is physically impossible, but that 'people must be known by their deeds, not by their own claims for themselves', or that action - apprehension of necessity - stands above empty triumphalism.
https://www.marxists.org/glossary/terms/h/i.htm