/lit/ - Literature

than similarly retarded anti woke stuff? I can see apparently when they are both being retarded, but my gut reaction to the latter is just thinking they are stupid, but the former, that they are disgusting.

Is it maybe that its an aperrant power differential that makes me feel this way? is it some sort of appreciation of the simplicity of shameless group thinking that doesnt try to mask it itself as something else? like noble savage shit? as apposed to those whos basic position is in combating a narrative but don’t adequately admit to forming a narrative themselves that requires a specific scapegoat to even exist a priori (not that aspects of the ”scapegoat” narrative dont have validity or isnt even true, but that the position requires it to be absolutely valid a priori as a starting point, which makes someone who begins from that new position focused on an end goal rather than a process). of course then the more “in group” people also do this to an extent, but I guess it feels more true to form? while there is something more visceral when someone talks about narratives and counter narritives in books published and shown on first shelves in Barnes and Noble and doesnt see the irony in creating a new narritive.


And this is not necessarily a left-right wing or some other shit either. or a racial or ideological thing, but in terms of process and representation.