/lit/ - Literature

>>18767126
>Reading in the morning
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE REEEEEEEEEEEEE REEEEEEEEEEEE

>>17190771
>spending $200 on a book

>browsing catalog
>see brainlet fuckboi dissing my nibba Nietzsche
>write two paragraph long posts of why OP is wrong
>no replies
>mfw

>>9499002

>>9125073
Nah, Nietzsche and Deleuze reign supreme in terms of enjoyment.

>>8416852
wat don't kill u make u stronger

"I want to live for a while amongst Muslims, in the places moreover where their faith is at its most devout; this way my eye and judgment for all things European will be sharpened."

>yfw Nietzsche would've bought a plane ticket to fight for the Islamic State.

>Women's period of storm and stress.

In the three or four civilized European countries, one can in a few centuries educate women to be anything one wants, even men--not in the sexual sense, of course, but certainly in every other sense. At some point, under such an influence, they will have taken on all male virtues and strengths, and of course they will also have to take male weaknesses and vices into the bargain. This much, as I said, one can bring about by force. But how will we endure the intermediate stage it brings with it, which itself can last a few centuries, during which female follies and injustices, their ancient birthright, still claim predominance over everything they will have learned or achieved? This will be the time when anger will constitute the real male emotion, anger over the fact that all the arts and sciences will be overrun and clogged up by shocking dilettantism; bewildering chatter will talk philosophy to death; politics will be more fantastic and partisan than ever; society will be in complete dissolution because women, the preservers of the old custom, will have become ludicrous in their own eyes, and will be intent on standing outside custom in every way. For if women had their greatest power in custom, where will they not have to reach to achieve a similar abundance of power again, after they have given up custom?