/lit/ - Literature

>>21405996
>During the time that I lived on a farmstead I was happier than I've ever been
Motherfucker is incapable of planning his time to go hiking so he wants everyone to force his dumb ass. LOL you need help.

Seriously Anon, get help you're suffering and becoming anti-social.

>>18881912

>>18799447

I need a text that defines Gothic as an aesthetic, bonus points if it also presents a genealogy of the Gothic.

Any recs?

>>10815712
because sand people have stupid fucking religions

>>10636969
>6969
nice.

How often do you have literary discussions in real life?

>>10513705
>>10513701
these graphs are disingenuous at best, mostly in relation to natsoc and facism.
despite national socialism having socialism in the title, it is by far one of the most pro capitalist systems in all of political theory. the socialistic aspects of natsoc only extend to community programs, while the rest of the economic system is just regular conservative style capitalism, if we were to go by your graphs.
fascism on the other hand is actually MORE socialist than natsoc, dictating exactly who earns what, with more emphasis on public funded utilities at the expense of privatization, granted this never goes as far as communism, statism, or any variant of """"real"""" socialism.

nationalism on the other hand is not a political class, its a political subclass. nationalism is something that is used to describe other systems, it is not a system in and of itself. nationalism describes a want to preserve tradition, but nothing else. it has no bearing on how the country itself is run, nor does it have a stance on the economy outside of whatever is traditional, which can be defined as something as arbitrary as "trading". having nationalism on these graphs would be the same as placing Christianity on this and saying that because they both seek to preserve tradition, they are both equally viable political options and should occupy space on the graph. religion may be used to describe other political leanings, but being part of a religion does not mean you are part of that lean just by association.