/lit/ - Literature

how is deleuze an accelerationist if acceleration of capital is a dialectical negation of difference when difference is deleuze's highest good?

Stop using language.

It is therefore true that God makes the world by calculating, but his calculations never work out exactly [juste], and this inexactitude or injustice in the result, this irreducible inequality, forms the condition of the world. The world 'happens' while God calculates; if the calculation were exact, there would be no world. The world can be regarded as a 'remainder', and the real in the world understood in terms of fractional or even incommensurable numbers. Every phenomenon refers to an inequality by which it is conditioned. Every diversity and every change refers to a difference which is its sufficient reason. Everything which happens and everything which appears is correlated with orders of differences: differences of level, temperature, pressure, tension, potential, difference of intensity.

Something that I've noticed is that people who take an interest in Whitehead, Deleuze, Derrida etc and who express an antipathy towards 'being' typically suffer from inwards flaws that make them seek to disassociate them from themselves, to metaphysically 'cuckold' themselves out of existence as it were. They then project this attitude onto everything and everyone which is why like western buddhists and anglo protestants they take to proselytizing their newfound beliefs because it helps to fill the hole in their heart

Why did Delueze not understand that multiplicity had already been completely BTFO by Aryan sages thousands of years ago and therefor his whole constructed metaphysical scheme was trash?

Did he not read Guenon or something?

I see pic related memed here all the time. Assuming I actually want to understand his arguments and not just shitpost phrases that pop up more than once, which books and theories should I familiarize myself with in order to understand him properly?

>>12861677
Deleuze was a sexy nigga

>>12859942
For me it's Deleuze

Stanley Fish is more based desu

what is a body without organs?

Already read spinoza what else should i read before getting into AO and ATP?

So what is the world according to Deleuze?
Is this the world that itself replicates and changes under the influence of the field, ie the environment?
Does Deleuze's philosophy have any tips, such as enjoying every day, appreciating small things. Is there any guide that would show me how to live well according to this philosophy?
Is this just a talk about evolution, but in a more complicated way and at the same time Yntellectual complaining about capitalism?

How does Deleuze break with Kant? Help me understand bros.

ITT: philosophers that failed in their attempt to dismantle Plato

Schizopunk

>>12234924

and any other french philosopher

>>12234934

back to r*ddit

>>12032660
Sweet chocolatey moses, I think we all know it's Deleuze.

based

Where do I start with the poststructuralists? Is there a start?

Do it more often

He was a 'genius' yet he got destroyed by some random French artist

Read my book it explains everything.