/lit/ - Literature

So he just described how memes work

What does antagonism without contradiction look like?

>>17045051
Gilles Deleuze, you Oedipal whore.

So what did he do, what is his legacy? Car commercials that appeal to your sense of individuality? Come on.

Deleuze is the poster boy of the worst kind of hyper-affected urbanite trash philosophy. There was no warrior spirit in him

>“Flying anuses, speeding vaginas, there is no castration.”
So THIS is the power of left-wing intellect

>>16497576

>>16364659
Anti Oedipus

It's easy, we kill the despotic father and reconnect our desiring machines.

ITT: Philosophers who would be Orthodox Christians if they were alive today

Where to start with deleuze? also which one of his books with guattari would you recommend?

EXPLAIN DELEUZE TO ME OR I'LL FUCKING KILL YOU! DON'T DUMB IT DOWN INTO SOME VAGUE SHIT! EXPLAIN DELEUZE TO ME RIGHT NOW OR I'LL LITERALLY FUCKING KILL YOu! WHAT THE FUCK IS A BODY WITHOUT ORGANS? WHAT THE FUCK ARE RHIZOMES? DON'T DUMB IT DOWN OR I'LL FUCKING KILL YOU

Why is he misinterpreted by right-wingers?

>>15306780
Sorry anon, Marx is only a level 3 thinker. To get to level 4 you need to tackle pic related

>>15243362
Agreed.

How can the modern right use the ideas of Deleuze? What does right-wing deleuzianism look like? (without occultism and anti-humanism)

>>14582008
However the Pali term sasastavada is never associated with the atman, but that the atman was an agent (karmin) in and of samsara which is subject to the whims of becoming (bhava), or which is meant kammavada (karma-ism, or merit agencyship); such as sassatavada in sutta = “atta ca so loka ca” (the atman and the world [are one]), or: ‘Being (sat, atthiti (views of either sabbamatthi ‘the all is entirety’, and sabbamekattan ‘the all is one’s Soul’ [SN 2.77] both are heresies of perpetualism]). Sasastavada is the wrong conception that one is perpetually (sassata) bound within samsara and that merit is the highest attainment for either this life or for the next. The heretical antinomy to nihilism (vibhava, or = ucchedavada) is not, nor in sutta, the atman, but bhava (becoming, agencyship). Forever, or eternal becoming is nowhere in sutta identified with the atman, which is “never an agent (karmin)”, and “has never become anything” (=bhava). These antinomies of bhava (sassatavada) and vibhava (ucchedavada) both entail illogical positions untenable to the Vedantic or Buddhist atman; however the concept of “eternalism” as = atman has been the fallacious secondary crutch for supporting the no-atman commentarialists position on anatta implying = there is no atman.

http://chinabuddhismencyclopedia.com/en/index.php/Anatta,_Anatman,_No-Self,_Soulessness_and_other_Nihilistic_bullshit_your_local_retarded_%27%27buddhist%27%27_will_tell_you_about.

Reading Deleuze, I do not understand half of the stuff. Is that okay? Will it get better one day? Or am I just too stupid?

why did this man invent desiring-machines?

where do I start with Deleuze?

Tell me what I need to know about Deleuze

redpill me on Deleuze

I fucking hate continentals so much. I just got home after a small house party where our host made us play french philosophers trivia quiz and all the other guests agreed because they were vile bugmen. Even my girlfriend wanted to do that because she's read all those turgid books and watched the documentaries. Later on she got genuinely upset because I knew no answers besides the ones to 2-3 very simple questions. I knew that there was no point in reminding her that I'm only into analytical metaphysics because I'd instantly get booed by those vulgar deconstructionists.

This truly is the most horrid timeline.

>>13637435
Deleuze is the next step.