/lit/ - Literature

GALAXY BRAIN: THE IDEA OF GRASSROOTS, WHETHER INDIVIDUAL OR COLLECTIVE, IS THE MOST ASTROTURFED IDEA THERE IS, IT IS THE VERY THING PREVENTING MEN FROM REALIZING THE FUNDAMENTAL AND ALL-PERVADING ASTROTURF: IT PREVENTS PEOPLE FROM RIGHTLY JUDGING THE WORLD AS EVIL BY SOCIALIZING THE GUILT, IT IMPRISONS PEOPLE INTO THE ABSURD CONTEXT OF MANDATORY VOLITION WHEREIN YOU MUST WANT, IT DEMONICALLY TRANSMUTES THE IMPOSSIBLE INTO THE INSUFFICIENTLY WANTED WHICH TURNS THE MOST INNOCUOUS THINGS AND EVEN LITERAL NOTHINGS INTO INSTRUMENTS OF POTENTIALLY INFINITE SUFFERING.

>>18268371
>the holes in this net were not created

>>16143791

Just consider germ theory, is it rather sound or rather unsound? Countless microscopic particles of countless kinds enter a man throughout his life yet only a statistically insignificant percentage thereof has the most drastic effect. Compare to, say, macroscopic intrusion.

What alleviated me:

1. Thinking about who and what Jesus is.

2. Vegan diet.

3. Eating nothing above room temperature.

>>13384750

Moreover, events that you've seen unfold in real time, like 9/11, are more, not less, cryptic than those purportedly understood by History. It is the Empirical, not the Rational, that is sickeningly strange and "unknowable", and doubly "Lovecraftian" by being hidden in plain sight. What is Sandy Hook? Stare at the pictures of those dark corridors, zoom in on the children's faces until they grimace, watch the absurd procession of the vehicles. Like a late morning dream you spend years in. It is Gehenna.

>>13126796

The CURTAIN of the TEMPLE hmmmMMMMMMMMMMMM?

>>12532615

>For they say that 'the Savior himself said: I came to destroy the works of the female'.

>>12010956

See:

>>12013311

>The awesome realization that personhood is superfluous and that everyone converges in the same plenitude of awareness is as easy to know and to reconcile with one's Self as it is hard to bare and to reconcile with the ostensibly Other. Thus a bilateral affirmation of triviality, culminating in romantic love, is undertaken in order to imply any essential difference or separation.

>>11991360
>I am a monster. I am a void that cannot be filled.

A woman cannot even fill herself for she is only a receptacle of no inherent substance. You could take all of them at once, with or without "loving" them, and be no more or no less full than you are by yourself.

>>11819081

Have you ever tried doing nothing at all in your free time?

>>11784564
>It seems like nothing a philosopher has ever written can't be refuted simply by saying "I disagree."

The implications of this are of the highest magnitude.

>when you consider the commandments and sins regarding EPISTEMOLOGY

>mom found herself

>>11593889

The Gospel of Philip is a perfect example of the Empirical-Positivist-Materialist principle of ineffable conspiracy as actual Ontology, the intersection of lesser polar opposites as functionally generative of the greater whole, a Metadualism. Epistemology splitting and relegating its own prostration to the CHAMBER for the sake of maintaining any barrier between you and the Phenomenal vista. Such is Schizophrenia, and Catholicism.

The notion that you can earnestly enjoy phenomena by and for yourself, and that they can generate any good that is foreign or somehow unattainable is absurd. "Anhedonia" is simply refusing to fully realize this and meandering through impotent illusions for various reasons.

>>11468225

Keep in mind that suicide as a naive rejection of the ostensibly external world will not alleviate you.

>>11460150

The purported relevance of birth to Materialist arguments is unfounded since it is the one event no one remembers.

Life is life-denying, or rather, simply denying. A particularity only is inasmuch as it is not another particularity. All the aspects of your personhood and phenomenal experience are negations of other personalities and phenomena.

Reminder that History consists of certain constructs rather than others by way of consensus alone, and that it is otherwise as incomprehensible as the phenomena associated with it, as all Phenomena are. Simply ignoring it is no harder than ignoring a dream.

>>11293487

Personhood already contains any and all atomized contractual horrors.

Antinatalism is bad because it denies life only inasmuch as it hurts, but otherwise affirms life and would gladly affirm it wholly would it consist exclusively of "good" things.

Life must be realized as a breaking wheel in its totality and only then denied as such.

>>11088802

He was really a you.