/lit/ - Literature

Husserl was 10x the thinker that Heidegger was.
>but muh naive Cartesianism
Read the later Husserl, specifically The Crisis of European Sciences.

Isn't Husserl's philosophy a rejection of Kant's concept thing-in-itself? I would like to know what Husserl's critique of Kant is.

So he considers intuitions as the highest stage of knowledge but what does he really mean by intuition? What would be a good pratical exemple? Also general husserl thread i guess.

Husserl’s phenomenology beginning through epoche begins with the pyrrhonian skepticism and sees what you can still say and do philosophy about at that point. His entire philosophical model is based on this kind of skepticism. The key is that no matter what kind of skepticism you hold, the statement “there is an experience of phenomena” more or less isn’t breakable: as it makes no ontological truth claims, claims nothing about like it side of man or any noumena or what occurs beyond the consciousness. The entire model being autistic analysis of consciousness and phenomena from the first person perspective. So no, as many phenomenologists come after Husserl there is no end to philosophy with pyrrhonianism.

Check out his Cartesian meditations for an intro.

>>17284000