/lit/ - Literature

>>15363910
>you get to be around intelligent people, dedicate yourself to learning full-time and open doors to careers that would otherwise be locked

You're either 60+ or have never set foot in a college.

>>14333928
That's completely different, niggynugs lack sentience

Marxism in a lot of ways resembles Abrahamism, and is as if a secular interpretation of it. Judaic influences on Marx's philosophy are undeniable and commonly addressed today. I would like to mention those who consider themselves to be followers of Marxist thought cannot agree on the interpretation of Marx's work. Each and every has their own little sect and there is constant infighting in what the proper way is to achieve communism.

This is not a problem with "right wingers" as they do not have any quarrels regarding the work of their own intellectuals. The interpretation on the doctrines of fascism would be the same to them all. Their argumentative points are all non fundamentals such as privatization vs nationalization of key industry sectors. Any specifics which fascists disagree on are currently not important when they have a much greater enemy to defeat. First I will demonstrate the views of a typical fascist.

Or a, National Pan-European Socialist.
In simpler terms, a nationalist who wants to cooperate with his neighbors to create a better tomorrow for the future generations as well as his own. He must also acknowledge that only those whom he is neighbors with he best cooperates with. Everyone else has the right to self determination in their own lands. If Europe feels the need to defend herself, then she will unite together as one to defeat her enemy.

A fascist believes in some sort of mixed economy. An economy that will suit the needs of the people and to give each the right to succeed under the best conditions through their own merit. May it be free enterprise or some nationalization. The people must not be exploited, and the state must keep the corporations in check and the people must keep the state in check.

The purpose being the right to prosper as much you are capable so long as you do not use the blood and sweat of the folk as the stepping stone to your capital throne.
In a society amongst good men, such a man would be respected and he himself would be an assistant in the betterment of the community.

I am not dogmatic so I will not say what I believe is the correct solution, but I consider fascism to be the way forward after a period of decadence. There are people whos thoughts I would entertain, maybe even stand shoulder to shoulder with so long as they believed in the right of a land to have a blood bond to it's people.

Authoritative Constitutional Republic
Strasserism
Syndicalism
Anarcho-Primitivism
Anarcho-Capitalism(?)
Soviet Communism(?)

Marxism in a lot of ways resembles Abrahamism, and is as if a secular interpretation of it. Judaic influences on Marx's philosophy are undeniable and commonly addressed today. I would like to mention those who consider themselves to be followers of Marxist thought cannot agree on the interpretation of Marx's work. Each and every has their own little sect and there is constant infighting in what the proper way is to achieve communism.

This is not a problem with "right wingers" as they do not have any quarrels regarding the work of their own intellectuals. The interpretation on the doctrines of fascism would be the same to them all. Their argumentative points are all non fundamentals such as privatization vs nationalization of key industry sectors. Any specifics which fascists disagree on are currently not important when they have a much greater enemy to defeat. First I will demonstrate the views of a typical fascist.

Or a, National Pan-European Socialist.
In simpler terms, a nationalist who wants to cooperate with his neighbors to create a better tomorrow for the future generations as well as his own. He must also acknowledge that only those whom he is neighbors with he best cooperates with. Everyone else has the right to self determination in their own lands. If Europe feels the need to defend herself, then she will unite together as one to defeat her enemy.

A fascist believes in some sort of mixed economy. An economy that will suit the needs of the people and to give each the right to succeed under the best conditions through their own merit. May it be free enterprise or some nationalization. The people must not be exploited, and the state must keep the corporations in check and the people must keep the state in check.

The purpose being the right to prosper as you see fit so long as you do not use the blood and sweat of the folk as the stepping stone to your capital throne.
In a society amongst good men, such a man would be respected and he himself would help in the betterment of the community.

I am not dogmatic so I will not say what I thing is the ideal solution, but I consider fascism to be the way forward after a period of decadence. There are people who's thoughts I would entertain, maybe even stand shoulder to shoulder with so long as they believed in the right of a land to have a blood bond to it's people.

Authoritative Constitutional Republic
Strasserism
Syndicalism
Anarcho-primitalism
Anarcho-Capitalism(?)
Soviet Communism(?)