/lit/ - Literature

>>21282469
Well that's interesting about qualia. The problem I see with subject-object and mind-matter relations is that they're fundamentally impossible to penetrate discursively, and therefore doesn't neuroscience mostly render that field redundant anyway?
>Dreyfus' Berkeley Being & Time lectures which are available free online in a few places
Thanks, they come up on a search. I'm also particularly interested in Dreyfus because he's the only person to look at AI through a Heideggerian lens and having studied AI his critique really appeals to me.
https://youtu.be/oUcKXJTUGIE
>hermeneutics
Is Gadamer a good intro?
>major research into neo-Platonism and esotericism and mysticism
Reading Culianu right now and loving it.
>>21282476
Thanks, this is a really good post. A lot to take in here and I doubt I can respond too meaningfully. Regarding what you said about Kant, it is honestly difficult to tell whether philosophy is in its infancy or death.
>look into transcendental Thomism, which is basically Aristotelian Neoplatonism (as Thomism was) plus modern critical philosophy
How do you feel about Gerson and his Ur-Platonism theory? (Keith Woods did a video essay on him recently but he's been on my radar for a while)
>Holmes
Already seen the whole thing (you see?)
>>21282544
I feel that German Idealism inevitably leads to conclusions that cross the line between episteme and gnosis and this is unacceptable to academic philosophy which has to sustain the metaphysical basis for science.
>>21282482
Meanwhile your post adds nothing besides cheap snark fit for reddit updoots.
>>21282565
Is Buber's "I and Thou" any good? Was considering picking it up.