/lit/ - Literature

>>16653792
Yes.
>>16653807
Yes.
>>16653847
Yes.
>>16653849
Yes.
>>16653872
Yes.
>>16653887
Yes.
>>16653935
Yes.

Wow, I managed to agree with everyone in the thread. Great job guys, group hug.

>>16635792
Clearly I've lost track of who is who here.

Anyway, you really think there are talented anons here? I mean, there might be two or three but the board is pretty run down these days. Trust me, I've had plenty of time to lurk it lately, at least 80% of the literary output is just brave new experiments in how to say "nigger". 6 years ago it was only marginally better and TAR just sort of "got by" before it went dead. The best minds still around are all avoidant loner types who are way too anxious to mix themselves up in something wild and crazy like sending an email.

Maybe you should have a junior publication for /lit/ and model it on TAR. Pay less (or nothing, so they can't cry about you being in it for the money) and the best can "graduate" to the quarterly? I feel like there being literally no stakes might make the schizoids feel comfier.