/lit/ - Literature

>>15282588
No it's that the author thinks a woman would ever proposition that 5/10 male for sex AND that he thinks she's not still getting piped by 9.9/10 alpha males multiple times a week even during quarantine
But good guess

>>13745795
>Do you have a source that virgin women have happier marriages on average? I thought we were basing this off of personal experience and knowledge? Logically, a woman who never had a partner before is not going to be as social.
So, you don't have a source for your theory.

>Okay, and you don't have to be to value a woman's performance in bed.
Yes, you do. You just said virgin women are worse because they are not good in bed.

>So do I. A woman that isn't very social will have less for me to have a conversation with her on. Conversations are very important to me.
You have no sources on virgin women being less social.

>I like women who have had some experience being women, and having sex with a man is part of being a woman.
WTF.
Having sex with men other than their husband is "part of being a woman" in your conception?
Does that mean that in your conception that women in other eras who have only had sex with their husband were "less of a woman" than modern sluts?
Should you allow your wife or girlfriend to sleep with other men so that they can become even more of a woman, in your opinion?

>>11799818
>meanwhile
Russel is so profoundly stupid outside of math it's hard to take him seriously. His philosophy is almost as bad as his history. He hasn't a shred of evidence for his claims but no lack claims.