/lit/ - Literature

>>12834987

In the Logical sense...not really. But barely anything can do anything at all in that sense anyway. In the Rational sense, yes. Think Pleroma-Kenoma, moreover, the fact that the imagine-do or make-lift parameters themselves make little sense in the spirit of your question; and, most importantly, the paradox of him making the stone that he cannot lift is not a curiosity, but fundamental to him making any stone at all.

>the absolute is something than self-identical intelligibility, intelligibility is just a mold which His will arbitrarily fills. At least until the inversion, and divine caprice becomes intensive, Bataillian prime matter. Proclus believed attributing will and movement to the One made it a creature like all the rest, a monster in fact. And that has happened.
>Seen through a keyhole the Solar Father will always seem the obscene Freudian patriarch.

This is good one.

>>11615586
>Yazad - Worthy of Worship

God not as Ontological tyrant barricaded behind countless terrors but as the Good itself, the immanent and free principle of principles.

>>9767478
>The way to do this is not taught, and it cannot be seen by the compounded element by means of which thou seest.

>>9730532

THE Subject meaning Consciousness outside of embodiment and personhood. THE Noumenon meaning this Subject being THE thing-in-itself, irreducible and indestructible. And THE Good meaning there is no greater good, since it precludes Evil by being above Mastery-Slavery by being One.

>stale

>>9615423
>tfw

>>9295508

Also be weary of images. Note how many modes of expression, like superposition, are all but forbidden. Ask yourself why this is.

It's a Spiritual book that stops short of directly invoking God.

Symphonic scorn aimed at Materialism, Individualism, vice, and the idea of the singular localized Self, very strong Moral component too. So much so that lots of passages could fit right into the Old Testament. Even though he does speak of different Theological ideas, it's always matter-of-factly. The whole thing is written from an Atheist perspective, though humbly so. Like he touched the Veil but didn't dare look beyond.