[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.17934251 [View]
File: 1.62 MB, 4000x2666, 1616763251632.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17934251

Nobody has been able to disprove me. Anything other than this is just malicious intent and psychopathy. This is the most objective way of living in a civilizational context. This will make every single race empathetic and remove all their traumas and suffering, everyone will be well-intended.
>Philosophy is the requirement for every civilization as no civilization can be created without symbols that unite it’s citizens to partake in the very same civilization, such that could be described as an ideology. Today we also use philosophy, although unknowingly to entertain a meaning of our life. For an example, a popular philosophy is that of authenticity which is derived from Existentialism. The problem is that philosophies are taken for granted and are not withstanding any scrutiny by it’s believers. That’s where the distinction begins. Philosophy, as it’s translation from ancient Greek is defined as love of wisdom. Following the meaning of the definition we come to the conclusion that you don’t actually love wisdom if you refuse to put everything through all forms of scrutiny as it exposes your unwillingness to find the truth and thus love of wisdom. This is the reason why we need to live in world wide philosophical societies, such that every human is able and required to fully contemplate their actions and it’s consequences. Without philosophy we cannot live in a coherent way in this construct we have as of now unless we have reached an objective truth or something absolute that can show us the perfect way to live. I label it as incoherent because in a society that doesn’t embrace philosophy instead forces us to rely on random cultural influence and biological determinism that accepts only basic emotions as truth which leads to chaotic, irrational and deadly actions. This is why we need to embrace living in a civilization and understand our duty of being philosophers. The only way to achieve this is by racially segregating people in the best climate for them. The very idea of ethnic diversity is flawed because it tries to mix people with very different features which creates unforeseen results and low trust societies. Through racial segregation people can become self-aware of their positive and negative ethnical and environmental qualities that prevent them from being philosophers, prevent unexpected behavior and strive to negate all negative qualities. For now, this sounds like the most reasonable and humane way to achieve world peace. In a world where people love wisdom and find their meaning of life by being philosophers who investigate the meaning of life and their problems while sharing it globally looks closer to virtuous living than in such that refuses to acknowledge it. Mandatory philosophical education for all ages that is focused on understanding and criticism is the most reasonable choice we can make in this age.

>> No.17872241 [View]
File: 1.62 MB, 4000x2666, 1 K1MUefS-DdmV7_bbiBw7-Q.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17872241

Nobody has been able to disprove me. Anything other than this is just malicious intent and psychopathy. This is the most objective way of living in a civilizational context. This will make every single race empathetic and remove all their traumas and suffering, everyone will be well-intended.
>Philosophy is the requirement for every civilization as no civilization can be created without symbols that unite it’s citizens to partake in the very same civilization, such that could be described as an ideology. Today we also use philosophy, although unknowingly to entertain a meaning of our life. For an example, a popular philosophy is that of authenticity which is derived from Existentialism. The problem is that philosophies are taken for granted and are not withstanding any scrutiny by it’s believers. That’s where the distinction begins. Philosophy, as it’s translation from ancient Greek is defined as love of wisdom. Following the meaning of the definition we come to the conclusion that you don’t actually love wisdom if you refuse to put everything through all forms of scrutiny as it exposes your unwillingness to find the truth and thus love of wisdom. This is the reason why we need to live in world wide philosophical societies, such that every human is able and required to fully contemplate their actions and it’s consequences. Without philosophy we cannot live in a coherent way in this construct we have as of now unless we have reached an objective truth or something absolute that can show us the perfect way to live. I label it as incoherent because in a society that doesn’t embrace philosophy instead forces us to rely on random cultural influence and biological determinism that accepts only basic emotions as truth which leads to chaotic, irrational and deadly actions. This is why we need to embrace living in a civilization and understand our duty of being philosophers. The only way to achieve this is by racially segregating people in the best climate for them. The very idea of ethnic diversity is flawed because it tries to mix people with very different features which creates unforeseen results and low trust societies. Through racial segregation people can become self-aware of their positive and negative ethnical and environmental qualities that prevent them from being philosophers, prevent unexpected behavior and strive to negate all negative qualities. For now, this sounds like the most reasonable and humane way to achieve world peace. In a world where people love wisdom and find their meaning of life by being philosophers who investigate the meaning of life and their problems while sharing it globally looks closer to virtuous living than in such that refuses to acknowledge it. Mandatory philosophical education for all ages that is focused on understanding and criticism is the most reasonable choice we can make in this age.

>> No.16583346 [View]
File: 1.62 MB, 4000x2666, 1_K1MUefS-DdmV7_bbiBw7-Q.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16583346

From what I've seen, all people into philosophy seem miserable and depressed. Even my dad, who majored in philosophy, struggles with depression. I'm very interested in it but it seems like a case of "ignorance is bliss". What's the point of getting into it if I'm gonna want to kill myself eventually? Are there any non-depressed philosophers/philosophy fans? Will philosophy even make my life better or just fuck it up even more?

>> No.16119415 [View]
File: 1.62 MB, 4000x2666, 1_K1MUefS-DdmV7_bbiBw7-Q.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16119415

>> No.15950709 [View]
File: 1.62 MB, 4000x2666, 1_K1MUefS-DdmV7_bbiBw7-Q.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15950709

I have the cynics and the stoics but who else is after Socrates and company?

>> No.15520663 [View]
File: 1.62 MB, 4000x2666, 1*K1MUefS-DdmV7_bbiBw7-Q.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15520663

When you study a philosopher or philosophical school, how much background reading do you do first?

A deep knowledge of every major work of western philosophy is obviously impossible to attain, but jumping into certain texts without adequate preparation, i.e. reading Kant's first critique without reading Hume, is obviously a bad idea. How do you find the balance?

>> No.14368607 [View]
File: 1.62 MB, 4000x2666, 1_K1MUefS-DdmV7_bbiBw7-Q.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14368607

So i decided i'm gonna listen philosophy audio books/lecture before sleep.

Need sources.

>> No.14189713 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 1.62 MB, 4000x2666, 123125236.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14189713

Prove to me philosophy is more than just INCEL coping.

Why should any man who gets regular pussy care about a thing these nerds have to say?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]