/lit/ - Literature

>NOOOO STOP USING WORDS HOWEVER YOU WANT NOOO STOP WRITING WHATEVER YOU WANT IN YOUR OWN BOOKS NOOOOOOOOOOOO

He is the worst of the worst. A champion of nonsense. Note that you must be very careful not to insult him if you want to ever bed a french or argentinian cutie.
>Other critics have dismissed Lacan's work wholesale. François Roustang called it an "incoherent system of pseudo-scientific gibberish", and quoted linguist Noam Chomsky's opinion that Lacan was an "amusing and perfectly self-conscious charlatan".[108] The former Lacanian analyst, Dylan Evans, eventually dismissed Lacanianism as lacking a sound scientific basis and as harming rather than helping patients, and has criticized Lacan's followers for treating his writings as "holy writ".[39] Richard Webster has decried what he sees as Lacan's obscurity, arrogance, and the resultant "Cult of Lacan".[109] Others have been more forceful still, describing him as "The Shrink from Hell"[110][111] and listing the many associates—from lovers and family to colleagues, patients, and editors—left damaged in his wake.

>>5959866
>there are no exact science facts
I know it's 80% bait but there are really people who argue like that seriously which makes me a little worried.
Since It's lit, here book. "Fashionable nonsense" for every so called "progressive". "postmodern leftist" trying to speak about exact science and make statements based on it.

>>5224102

Too bad no one takes Feyerabend seriously.

Pic very related

So we can all agree that the postmodern and post structural schools of thought are ultimately mental masterbation that while is useful in pointing out the pitfalls of pure knowledge and reason, does not actually contribute to our empirical knowledge or point out anything that wasn't already obvious, right?