[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.11060384 [View]
File: 53 KB, 476x625, unnamed.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11060384

*unblocks your Self*

>> No.11042473 [View]
File: 53 KB, 476x625, unnamed.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11042473

*continues your legacy*

>> No.11042116 [View]
File: 53 KB, 476x625, unnamed.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11042116

>>11041656
Lacan la can't

>> No.11028499 [View]
File: 53 KB, 476x625, unnamed.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11028499

Who gives a damn about endless theoretical diarrhoea?
Stay true to the Self, nigga.

>> No.9049516 [View]
File: 57 KB, 476x625, IMG_3690.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9049516

Red pill me on Jung. Also, which of his books are the ones where he speaks about Jungian typology and the cognitive functions?

>> No.9008550 [View]
File: 53 KB, 476x625, jungredbook1a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9008550

>>9008495
Carl Jung is not cringe you uneducated swinal pleb, he is one of the greatest minds, and certainly the most greatest psychologist ever to make a step on earth.

Why do you think Peterson uses the concepts (or Darwinian truths I may say hehe) of archetypes in his own pragmatic theory of truth philosophy? Peterson himself speaks highly of Jung, no doubt in my mind why.

Learn about Jung and become aware of collective consciousness. Or - stay a philistine and fail (if you are male) to reach the hierarchical top.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]