/lit/ - Literature

>Look, Anons reading Crime and Punishment
>What a loser
>I bet he thinks it's a classic what a cuck.

>Anon thinks crime and punishment is 'comfey' reading!
>I bet he's never even read the book.

>Anon thinks The Great Gatsby is good book.
>He doesn't think there's anything wrong with all the coincidence's
>This is why your gay Anon.

>Anon liked catcher in the rye.
>Unironically

>>8497015
>he fell for the "writing rules" meme
>he really fell for it

>current year
>he reads fiction

>>8231255

>>6765978
>implying subjectivity can be intrinsic

>>6706102
>marry

>>6575178
Ladies and gentlemen, "Getting It Backwards, the Post"

>>6566983
>That book is a non sequitur. This incident is a non sequitur.

Please observe my first post in this thread
>>6565467

Please observe the first response to that post
>>6565498

Someone, probably you, asked for a source for my comments.
I mentioned the well-footnoted, well-researched NYT bestseller that Chomsky states is accurate as a source for my statements.

non se·qui·tur
ˌnän ˈsekwədər/
noun
a conclusion or statement that does not logically follow from the previous argument or statement.

Since the reference to the book must be relevant, you are incorrect.

I WOULD, though, argue, that your response to that, found here,

>>6565547
IS a non-sequitur

>He's doing a non-STEM degree