/lit/ - Literature

>>16576712
I once tried to challenge my prejudice towards pajeets and I went on youtube to watch documentaries and what not. One ted talk was about the problem of public defecation in India, the other was about the problem of littering (the problem is so huge it has a ted talk). Indian "philosophy", from what I saw discussed here is utter shit. Coping shitskins trying to square peg round hole something about how they invented [insert concept] before [insert western philosopher]. It always turns out to be bullshit. Kamasutra is garbage (I tried reading that too). You'd think that if a culture preserves some text about the art of lovemaking for this long, it must be worthwhile, an incel like me might actually learn something from it. Wrong. I got as far as the chapter on bite marks, then I just just bailed on this degenerate shit. From this wizened old tome you can learn such factoids like "no female orgasm, no pregnancy". How fucking stupid do you need to be to copy this obvious bullshit for centuries?

By the way, one of Pinker's books (the one about human nature) has a list of human universals, one of which is private defecation. Guess you need to strike this one down.

>The most famous book on sex was written by a guy who never had sex.