/lit/ - Literature

>>3951870
> why would anyone fuck a stuck up cunt like Simone?

But she's a qt

Also that photo of her ass which I'm afraid to post because I'll probably get banned again

Why aren't you a feminist, /lit/?

1/2

>The terms masculine and feminine are used symmetrically only as a matter of form, as on legal papers. In actuality the relation of the two sexes is not quite like that of two electrical poles, for man represents both the positive and the neutral, as is indicated by the common use of man to designate human beings in general; whereas woman represents only the negative, defined by limiting criteria, without reciprocity. In the midst of an abstract discussion it is vexing to hear a man say: ‘You think thus and so because you are a woman’; but I know that my only defence is to reply: ‘I think thus and so because it is true,’ thereby removing my subjective self from the argument. It would be out of the question to reply: ‘And you think the contrary because you are a man’, for it is understood that the fact of being a man is no peculiarity. A man is in the right in being a man; it is the woman who is in the wrong. It amounts to this: just as for the ancients there was an absolute vertical with reference to which the oblique was defined, so there is an absolute human type, the masculine.

>>2938775

OP may be spot on.
Ever since I read Sartre's review of The Stranger, I totally don't look at it (i.e. CARE about it) the same way.

you know she'd be down for some kinky liberated shit