/lit/ - Literature

>butterfly derails my thread with his retardation

>>11802910
>working and child-rearing is the product of capitalism

>>11026070
Why don't you faggot just fuck off?
>mmmkay
you have no business here, you imbecile.

>how old are you my son?
>26--66 years younger than you are gramps

>>6379567

>Oh we just want wider appeal. And then you get into what their precise complaints are - women and blacks and others getting nominated.

That's never been a complaint. They're not complaining that guys like THIS are nominated and win:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_R._Delany

Because they don't care about the identity politics.

> SF has a diverse readership and diverse writers.

And yet, if you espouse a particular set of political positions, you are significantly less likely to be nominated for the award.

>This is the rights problem, everything must be indeological lockstep for them.

So why did they nominate a slate of politically diverse writers? Where is this 'lockstep' you speak of?

>Shit son you just lost it big and showed you've never read SF in your life

I'm waiting. Name them, and lets see if its been within the last 10 years. or 15.

>>5889246
>that sentence structure

>>5737826
ok

I read the first few chapters. It was a bunch of weeb shit guised as high fantasy. Don't see where the hype is coming from.