[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.12117165 [View]
File: 642 KB, 889x644, 0_Y8kTQJn0yLA980oU.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12117165

INELUCTABLE MODALITY OF THE VISIBLE: AT LEAST THAT IF NO MORE, thought through my eyes. Signatures of all things I am here to read, seaspawn and seawrack, the nearing tide, that rusty boot. Snotgreen, bluesilver, rust: coloured signs. Limits of the diaphane. But he adds: in bodies. Then he was aware of them bodies before of them coloured. How? By knocking his sconce against them, sure. Go easy. Bald he was and a millionaire, maestro di color che sanno. Limit of the diaphane in. Why in? Diaphane, adiaphane. If you can put your five fingers through it, it is a gate, if not a door. Shut your eyes and see.

>> No.11617130 [View]
File: 642 KB, 889x644, IMG_1268.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11617130

Ok /lit/, I'm finally reading Joyce, starting with Dubliners. What am I in for? Is it as hard to read as his infamous other works?

>> No.11387399 [View]
File: 642 KB, 889x644, 0_Y8kTQJn0yLA980oU.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11387399

What's the best way to read Ulysses? With or without a guide or annotations? Should one read A Portrait and/or Dubliners before reading Ulysses? Also Joyce thread I guess.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]