/lit/ - Literature

>>14042904
GENESIS IS CRYSTALMAN'S DIARY: Ialdabaoth's clotting of the World-Scab: the Hebrew word bara seems to imply Genesis was more process of structuration than creation
Genesis as the Fall (the cut from eternity) is the basic case of Lacanian suture, the fall [difference] as such rather than for another. Or, of [multiplicative/difference-potential] identification as such rather than as an identification of a [singular/naturalised] thing.
>the assignment of functional determinations to raw matter, not its conjuration ex nihilo: in Judea light expels darkness but in the inner country it's light that's been coagulated into mass: FIAT NOX: “be fruitful and multiply”: plasma drying into the dialectical honeycomb of the principium individuationis:
"dialectical honeycomb." That one's gonna be on my mind for a while.
>creating space the Bronze Bull, which Weinberg miraculously formalized all on his own: (Hd) : (entropic) distanciation attenuates empathy (“space is a blood-fat sponge”): the Earth is now a transcendental Wound: shadow ontology pleasure farm, NON-OBVIOUS HELL: where the emission of your essence is orgasmic and “FOOD IS LOVE”: the subject's inclusion in the web could only denaturalize it:
You've laid out the trap of reticulation very well so far, I don't have much to add.
>there is what Weinberg calls the human UI - “man as a part of nature” - and there is Zizek's void of the Subject within which every man is identical with his own eternity**
And there it is: the elusive Outside, though not the usual NRx or Nyx brand of cheap "cyber-organic" Landian exotericism. Better to let the Germans be our building blocks, and they all relied on Kant.
>it is the case that we are both contracting into our medial vector, and that something surrenders (homeostatic determinism: the kingdom of objectivity is regenerated by birth: public and private space are mutual parasites***) through the quantum leap of Internality – things redoubled inside the subject's void - the exaggerated becomes supernormal (“anime as super-simulacra”):
Exactly right, this is part of what rattled Baudrillard: the clinical perversion of Taste (drawn out of Lacan's reading of Kant, among my favorites) exclaimed not by analytic intervention on behalf of the subject's desire but exclaimed FROM cultural historicising (e.g. 'disneyfication') in the interests of [mass] objectification.
>anime as hyper-paedomorphia = the effacement/tokenization of the complexity, “quantum grit” of adulthood:
Exactly, it's a denigration of even more than just the "mystic-vitalist" body of it's observants [i.e. a moral decay]: it's pure perversion, reflexive denial of history.
>in other words, an immanent atman – “a minimally self-referencing loop”, a taster that tastes, a seer that sees– is the a priori condition of capitalism and supernormal runaway:
This is what got Deleuze pegged as a fascist/nativist, and also where Land's reading of Marx and Deleuze goes foul. 1/2