/lit/ - Literature

>>19657197
You gotta get rid of this nasty habit of comparing yourself to the entirety of the World. What rationality is there in that? How is it most accurate to look at things on a universal scale compared to, say, on a quantum plane, especially when such impressions are based on secondhand observation made to fit your level of sensation? Believing in one's own value is no less rational, and even of it was, why do you place so much value on this secular worldview? Truth is not unfiltered information; it is a hierarchy of knowledge for what is important, and importance is a human concept. Will you not get the furthest by operating at a human level, the one you are of and best made to navigate? Isn't that most sensible? You yourself don't see the World as a marble and you as an ant, but as an environment you can't view all at once with good resolution and yourself as the lens, interpreter, and engager of all else.