/lit/ - Literature

Genuine question. Why are Deleuzians so obsessed with applying rhizomes and bodies w/o organs to gender theory? I haven't read D&G directly but I would assume their ideas are more complex and thought out than 'i can be girl if i think i am' '

>schizo on 4chan are actually using schizoanalysis

>>17954339
Squatting on your territory rent free.

>>17922508
*blocks you’re path*
You bedder stop biunivocalizing zose polyvocalities, monsieur

>>17871976
>Is psychology a bunch of horseshit
Yes
> basically some shit that charlatans have invented to more easily regulat, police, map and control us?
No

>>17848938
*blocks you’re path*

I recently started subtitling these lectures from 1975 in english. May be of interest to someone, I think some things still hold great relevance today.

https://youtu.be/_TwX8x3FuyM

body without organs... rhizome... tf these niggas even talking bout

>It should be no surprise that Guattari, whose work in Anti-Oedipus was anti-familial to say the least, was not a fan of family in real life. Under the mentorship of his friend Jean-Claude Polack, Guattari became an “impenitent womanizer.” The habit would last until the end of his life, a month before he died at the age of 62, he started an affair with a 26-year-old Serbian actress, whom Guattari encouraged to “have lots of lovers, but don’t leave me!”.

>>13936320
Nah, he'll be remembered like we remember the Italian Futurists. Mencius Moldbug will be like Maurice Joly and the other Monarchist apologists of the 19th century.

His inspirations though, they'll be vindicated. Postscript on Societies of Control will be taught in modern history classes in a few decades as the most prophetic essay of the 20th Century.

any prerequisities for CAPITALISM AND SCHIZOPHRENIA or can i jump straight in?

>>12187383
>I want to work in prisons and with mentally ill people.
Groovy D and G got you bro

>>12139913
I wish I had a good pal to drink and complain about things with.

>>12105413
*laughs in french*

>>11984325
are they cool enough to hang with these broskis

or will guattari pour a beer on their heads and call them nerds while deleuze pretends not to see it

Why does philosophy have its own archetypal stoner duo? What kind of Cheech and Chong Harold and Kumar Jay and Silent Bob shit is this? Did they do everything for the giggles?

How do I become a body without organs?

>>11372671
looks pretty chill to me

*write thousand-pages long disstrack on Freud*

>muh useless mumbo-joombo garbage

u know nothing
http://www.metamute.org/editorial/articles/art-war-deleuze-guattari-debord-and-israeli-defence-force

It just started

Were they right? Also why do they always look like a stoner comedy duo

Were they tripping here?

Any advice on applying the Deleuzoguattarian concept of rhizomatic learning to my kid's homeschooling?