/lit/ - Literature

>>14614340
>projecting this hard
never going to make it

>>13043630
>Oh, LEtS UsE WoRDS LiKE NeUROTranSmiTTers to MaKe uS SouND LiKE SCiENTiSTs.
I am a scientist and neurotransmitter isn't even some jargon that would otherwise be obscurantist. To think it's profound shows that you really quite the brainlet.
>Yeah, having an orgasm will release serotonin and dopamine, but it's also something that PEOPLE HAVE BEEN DOING FOR LITERALLY HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF YEARS.
Non-sequitur. Your rationale does not logically follow the antecedent.
You're not very intelligent.
>You're trying to make masturbation into some designer drug,
In some respects, it's worse. A drug can be used for non-recreational ends. Masturbation is purely a hedonistic activity.
You're reinforcing evolution's foremost goal, what it thinks is procreation, something powerful enough to subdue prefrontal neurotransmission, with a virtually unlimited supply able to be conjured on a whim by passing stimuli or your own imagination. Soon enough, the entire brain becomes muddied, that great organ, once the source of great dreams, is reduced to a pathetic hypersexualized dick-for-a-brain state.
>Let people enjoy things, you puritan fuck.
This was never intended for the panem et circenses plebeians. They're free to go to their own demise, as are potentially great men free to heed the wise, age-old advice of semen retention, something practiced from great men from Pythagoras to Newton To Kant to Tesla. You'll never join their ranks. You're too busy following the examples of beasts and men who imitate them.