/lit/ - Literature

>>11252524
i still don't fully understand a lot of things and disagree with some others though. mainly the almost obsessive use of God, specifically the christian God. it's kinda hypocritical and even deluded to reduce the whole hegelian problem to his understanding of a christian god. this obviously conflicts with the buddhist point of view which i hold very dear.
some other statements which i still can't make strong arguments for are the necessity of a goal and the definition of "the world" if we don't equate it with a God or some permanent, perfect essence/nature.