/lit/ - Literature

>>3317768
>I am not claiming that people have "natural rights" or anything like that. Communities will choose their own value systems, and if they value freedom over well-being then so be it. What is your objection? Do you have evidence as to the objective wrongness of preferring freedom to "well-being"?
>I am not claiming that people have "natural rights" or anything like that. Communities will choose their own value systems, and if they value freedom over well-being then so be it. What is your objection? Do you have evidence as to the objective wrongness of preferring freedom to "well-being"?
>I am not claiming that people have "natural rights" or anything like that. Communities will choose their own value systems, and if they value freedom over well-being then so be it. What is your objection? Do you have evidence as to the objective wrongness of preferring freedom to "well-being"?

I haven't stated that there is an inherent "rightness" of property rights. You are the one arguing for moral objectivity.

>>3266173
>You were robbed, beaten, possibly shot, if you were female you were raped, and you're telling me that you're going to show up to work?

Of course, I need to catch the thugs who did this. All the more reason to work extra hard in order to bring them to justice. I would also be able to take time off after their arrest since I would receive monetary compensation for the trauma I've suffered.

>They're going to shrug and say "Well, I pay, and I've never had any problems. They should've just paid."

But the scenario was that the security people didn't care that I paid and decided to rob my by gunpoint. If I'm looking for a security company, would I pick one that turns on its customers?