/lit/ - Literature

>>21193564
It's Dragon Ball, not Dragon Ball Z.

>>21194280
My thinking was that it'd show the development of &amp while maintaining some of editor's choices (whether ordering was ever deliberate or not).

>>21194121
>eh pile
Most of those were drop-outs from the starred category anyway. If someone rec'd one from down there I'd consider it, but I'm not really concerned about them. The only pieces down there that I still think about are Noodle House (explained later) , Jibaku, and Rural Life.
>Longing
I thought we'd reached an agreement to scrap that one in favour of Newlyweds(?), so I'll scrub that one. Thanks for pointing that out

Recently I received another anon's list of favourites and every piece bar one was already in the starred section (I have to remember to add stars for that guy), which made me more confident in the current iteration. Only piece that was out was Noodle House, so I'm going to give that one a proper read myself in case I missed something--one of the few I never read myself. I remember it having strong support from some people, countered by being shit on in the document.

Anyway, I've been thinking of the current list as more or less complete for a while, but I was thrown for a loop by the Honest Work recommendation--it cast a shadow of doubt over me. I'm just a step from being willing to run with the current iteration. Close to the time when I'll do my final personal arbitration.

>editing
I've worked out something for that. I was having trouble extracting formatting (e.g., newlines) from the pages, but that's good to go now. I've got a spell-checker, so it's a matter of just going through the pieces now. It's edits for mistakes (e.g., inconsistencies, grammar) that I'm really concerned about, but I'm also wary of making those changes.

>>21194121
>>21194317
>illustrations
I'd definitely go the public domain root apart from throwing in my own shit, but the latter mostly only works for my own pieces. What's the actual copyright on the Canva stuff? I'm a little critical of using that as a resource (same reason as with AI art: soulless), but I'd take a look if you made it available.

I'll also take any and all suggestions for illustrations, and I can act as "director" as >>21194581 puts it.

>>21194538
>different fonts
I like the idea conceptually, but I think it'd look bad in practice. I'm a little concerned about homogeneity when it comes to illustrations and shit (I don't want my own style bleeding onto everything), but I think a cover is one place to focus on consistency.