[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.795327 [View]
File: 14 KB, 500x456, final1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
795327

>>795291
Look, the stance of an Atheist Agnostic, also known as a weak Atheist, is thus:

We can't know whether there is a god (Any god, let me stress that again ANY GOD, not just a monotheistic god, Christianity, Judaism, ect..) or not. You can't prove god's existence and you can't prove his non-existence (this is the agnostic part). So logically, they choose not to believe in god (the atheist part).

I do agree that Gnostic Atheists are just as bad as Gnostic Theists (kind of a redundant term) but life would be a lot easier if people took the time to understand the actual stance of Agnostic Atheism before calling it a "religion" or any such term or phrase.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]