/lit/ - Literature

>>5823888
>File under D

>>5761131
Give her the Dowry

>>5584495
because of the D?

Duuude, dude, what if like, there weren't ten categories, like, there were only two men?

>>4882367
>loli aksin for it from a grown up dic
Wait, what are we talking about?

>>4556931
and aids

>muh dick

Philosophy thread /lit/

Can someone explain to me what the core of Descartes first two meditations is? I've read them and I'm easily understanding details, but I can't step back and see the 'bigger picture'.

And yes, general philosophy thread

>>4027907

Do I exist?

Your sister wants the D.

Agreed, his dirty letters to his wife were much better.

"My sweet naughty girl I got your hot letter tonight and have been trying to picture you frigging your cunt in the closet. How do you do it? Do you stand against the wall with your hand tickling up under your clothes or do you squat down on the hole with your skirts up and your hand hard at work in through the slit of your drawers? Does it give you the horn now to shit? I wonder how you can do it. Do you come in the act of shitting or do you frig yourself off first and then shit? It must be a fearfully lecherous thing to see a girl with her clothes up frigging furiously at her cunt, to see her pretty white drawers pulled open behind and her bum sticking out and a fat brown thing stuck half-way out of her hole. You say you will shit your drawers, dear, and let me fuck you then. I would like to hear you shit them, dear, first and then fuck you. Some night when we are somewhere in the dark and talking dirty and you feel your shite ready to fall put your arms round my neck in shame and shit it down softly. The sound will madden me and when I pull up your dress "

The Giver

>>3671866

Thus even if reason does not accurately portray the reality of things, the rules of reason exist within its own world. Because the definition of reason is a set of rules independent of experience. Thus things within the intelligible realm can at least be objectively determined within that world. Although Kant admits it is impossible to absolutely determine things in the physical world.

My additional take (not expressed by Kant) is that also, if you admit that reason is the wrong way to interpret reality, then you are in-inadvertently admitting there is a correct reality to interpret. Nietzsche says no, there's just different ways of looking at things. But if there is no level of objectivity, and thus no level of determination, then isn't there nothing? Meaning has no meaning.

>>3643972
>mvq

shit or get off the pot.
ask her what she's reading, then get her number.

and get back to reading

>I have encountered a most brilliantly talented 13 year old in my class
>How do I help this kid along?

>>3511212
you just blew my fucking mind, man

"In this moment, I am. Not because, of some demon's illusions manipulating my perceptions but, because, I have given her the dick."

I think, therefore I am

>>3445722

You know what you should give to your teacher...

>>3403019
We must first begin by doubting whether or not women want the dick. But if women did not want the dick, then we would not have dicks, as we would have evolved to have something different down there. Therefore, give her the dick.

>>3377322

>>3362662
>implying the very fact that you can think about your own existence doesn't prove the existence of it completely