/lit/ - Literature

>>16692735

>>14599093

>>13979240
None other than Nick Land. Imagine poking him in his social intelligence over and over and stepping on his toes repeatedly as he goes on and on stammering and muttering about 'technocapital depatchwork network intelligences.' 'Heh, capital prevents you from doing anything you slenderman fuck, what are you gonna do? Huh, what are you gonna do? Technocapital demands your compliance to this.' All while poking him harder in the chest but also appearing a bit weak and fearful.
Until he finally starts shaking, swings a couple times chasing you down before connecting, and then breaks his faggot capitalized wrist with a single punch.

what about speed and ketamine?

>>13357689
Yeah. Capital in its end is like an universe consuming AI which determines the present, feeding us into the NeoChina beyond the sun. You are derived intelligence of this future.

>>13336965
He'd need like a super advanced AI, nothing else would have the processing power.

>>13021737
pretty sure we talked about this when it came out

>>12848242
N,N-DMT
>>12848234
>He doesn't let hypersynthetic drugs click into digital voodoo while he waits for Neo-China to arrive from the future.

>>12820214
cause Gnon sounds cyberpunk af my dude

>>12310301
Sentience is not what Land was concerned with, he was concerned with intelligence. For Land, intelligence is basically another word for problem solving (more accurately game winning). Capitalism is intelligent in that it regulates its own runaway collapse therefore extending the explosive tendency towards null (k=0). Sentience implies feeling, which, although a possibility for complex emergent AI systems which are assembling themselves from the future at this very moment, is not necessary for Land's idea of intelligence. Imminent AI (captialism) isn't anthro, it doesn't need to "feel" because it operates, it converges.
>Capital concentration is a synthetic characteristic of capitalization. It cannot be assumed that measures of capital concentration. capital density, capital composition and cybernetic intensity will be easily accessible or neatly coincide.
-Teleoplexy
>The story goes like this: Earth is captured by a technocapital singularity as renaissance rationalitization and oceanic navigation lock into commoditization take-off. Logistically accelerating techno-economic interactivity crumbles social order in auto-sophisticating machine runaway. As markets learn to manufacture intelligence, politics modernizes, upgrades paranoia, and tries to get a grip.
-Meltdown

Currently in the middle of reading Nick Land's Fanged Noumena. Are there any other works of literature that address the relationship between anti-matter and spirituality/philosophy?

It would be if you fuckers talked about philosophy more!

>Rogan: One of the things that I’ve been thinking about a lot over the last few years is that one of the things that drives a lot people crazy is how many people are obsessed with materialism and getting the latest greatest thing, and I wonder how much of that is – well a lot of it is most certainly fueling technology and innovation. And it almost seems like it’s built in to us. It’s like, what we like and what we want, that we're fueling this thing that’s constantly around us all the time. And it doesn’t seem possible that people are going to pump the brakes. It doesn’t seem possible, at this stage, where we are constantly expecting the newest iPhone, the newest Tesla update, the newest Macbook Pro; everything has to be newer and better. And that’s going to lead to some incredible point. And it seems like it’s built into us, it almost seems like an instinct. That we are working towards this, that we like it. That our job, just like the ants build the anthill, our job is somehow to fuel this.

>Musk: Yes. When I made those comments some years ago – but – it feels like we are the biological bootloader for AI, effectively. We are building it. And then, we’re building progressively greater intelligence, and the percentage of intelligence that is not human is increasing, and eventually we will represent a very small percentage of intelligence. But the AI isn’t formed, strangely, by the human limbic system. It is, in large part, our Id writ large.

>>11622595
Nicholas Landrover

I'll give it a bump

>>11502431
where we're going, we won't need wrists...

>>11330357
No.