[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.21760037 [View]
File: 34 KB, 400x400, 1520413588338.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21760037

Is anything this guy has ever written worth reading at all?

>> No.13418575 [View]
File: 35 KB, 400x400, v7t45Wil_400x400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13418575

>Looking for Alaska
>The Fault in our Stars
>Paper Town
>Turtles All the Way down

>> No.12004050 [View]
File: 34 KB, 400x400, john green.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12004050

>What is it about King’s writing that appeals to so many people? Clearly, King’s readers — many of whom seem to get hooked on him when they are adolescents — don’t care that the sentences he writes or the scenes he constructs are dull. There must be something in the narrative arc, or in the nature of King’s characters, that these readers can’t resist. My sense is that King appeals to the aggrieved adolescent, or the aggrieved nerdy adolescent, or the aggrieved nerdy adult, who believes that people can be divided into bad and good (the latter would, of course, include the aggrieved adolescent or adult), a reader who would rather not consider the proposition that we are all, each of us, nice good people awash in problems and entirely capable of evil. King coddles his readers, all nice, good, ordinary, likeable people (just like the heroes of his books), though this doesn’t completely explain why these readers are so tolerant of the bloat in these novels, why they will let King go on for a couple hundred pages about some matter that has no vital connection to the subject of the book.
>By bestowing rewards on writing that is not all that good, has not the literary establishment lowered standards and pushed even further to the margins writing that is actually good and beautiful? If you ask me whether it is worth your while to read Stephen King instead of (or even in addition to) scores of other better contemporary writers you may have never read (and should hurry up and read before you die), I would say no, unless you are maybe fifteen and have made it clear to your teachers and everybody else that you aren’t going to touch that literary “David Copperfield kind of crap” with a ten-foot pole.
>My son, George, who is now twenty-four, read a little King in high school, but he hasn’t gone back to him since then. After you’ve read Roberto Bolaño and Denis Johnson and David Foster Wallace and Thomas Pynchon, as my son has, why would you return to Stephen King? King may be an adequate enough escape from life, if that’s all you require from a book of fiction, but his work (or what I’ve read of it) is a far cry from literature, which, at its best, is, sentence by sentence, a revelation about life.

is he right?

>> No.11827850 [View]
File: 35 KB, 400x400, 1531509119459.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11827850

>>11827828
A modern day Shakespeare

>> No.11775172 [View]
File: 35 KB, 400x400, 1531509119459.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11775172

>>11774175

>> No.11467094 [View]
File: 35 KB, 400x400, 1531509119459.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11467094

>>11467086

>> No.11462833 [View]
File: 34 KB, 400x400, v7t45Wil_400x400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11462833

Where should I start?

>> No.11456060 [View]
File: 34 KB, 400x400, v7t45Wil_400x400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11456060

>>11456048

>> No.11402967 [View]
File: 34 KB, 400x400, v7t45Wil_400x400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11402967

toxic masculinity is the only thing keeping him from the english canon

>> No.11068653 [View]
File: 34 KB, 400x400, soy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11068653

I'd beat the shit out of him and his retarded brother

>> No.11062570 [View]
File: 47 KB, 400x400, 7426AEC8-0428-49C2-AB37-2EE27F5EF57C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11062570

where do i start with this guy?

>> No.10964096 [View]
File: 34 KB, 400x400, v7t45Wil_400x400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10964096

How is John Green popular? I looked at the first chapter of Turtles All the Way Down and the imagery and ideas seem ludicrously bad.

https://www.penguin.co.uk/articles/find-your-next-read/extracts/2017/oct/turtles-all-the-way-down/

>> No.10947461 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 34 KB, 400x400, v7t45Wil_400x400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10947461

he's not that bad, is he?

>> No.10818352 [View]
File: 34 KB, 400x400, john green.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10818352

>What is it about King’s writing that appeals to so many people? Clearly, King’s readers — many of whom seem to get hooked on him when they are adolescents — don’t care that the sentences he writes or the scenes he constructs are dull. There must be something in the narrative arc, or in the nature of King’s characters, that these readers can’t resist. My sense is that King appeals to the aggrieved adolescent, or the aggrieved nerdy adolescent, or the aggrieved nerdy adult, who believes that people can be divided into bad and good (the latter would, of course, include the aggrieved adolescent or adult), a reader who would rather not consider the proposition that we are all, each of us, nice good people awash in problems and entirely capable of evil. King coddles his readers, all nice, good, ordinary, likeable people (just like the heroes of his books), though this doesn’t completely explain why these readers are so tolerant of the bloat in these novels, why they will let King go on for a couple hundred pages about some matter that has no vital connection to the subject of the book.


What's John Green's fucking Problem?

>> No.10806871 [View]
File: 34 KB, 400x400, AE465E79-BEFB-4783-86B6-5D75462D1ECA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10806871

Is anything this guy has ever written worth reading at all

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]