/lit/ - Literature

>>9657415
>lol
lol

My interests are in metaphysics, not politics. Politics is just debased metaphysics. Capital is a thing and the spice must flow. Land's line of thinking is cogent and completely believable. Did you read Greenspan's thesis? She lays it out pretty simply.

>since it's inevitable in principle
It actually isn't, but it basically charts a trajectory of despair that given the breakdown in anything like a coherent body of political science - or, put another way, the inability to use 20C political thinking to solve the problems of the 21st - it can be much more likened to the prognosis of a patient who can't stop stuffing himself with cheeseburgers. Yes, it's possible that the patient will stop. Will he? Who knows?

The problem isn't that Kant, Marx, Deleuze or Land are wrong. It's that they were all right. Sure, I could offer you some kind of meme ideology or solution. I don't have one. There are no quick fixes. So we all sit back and watch the ground crumble underneath our feet instead. And read, and figure out how things got to be that way, and so on.

Cynicism is shit, though.