/lit/ - Literature

>>16687392
Not the anon you are responding to but there are definitely plenty of weird chuds around who want to fit /lit/ into a pantheon of boards with /pol/ and /x/ by focusing on mystical fascism. A few months ago there were even big /natsoc/ generals, the Evola threads, and the "we need to do something about the evils of wikipedia" threads. From the latter topic and the fact that they attempted to crowd out all other discussion from the board they are quite obviously obsessed with making this "their" space. Anything that attracts people who might not subscribe to that ideology to this board and pushes down their beloved threads is a threat and so they want to harass it out of existence.
>>16687469
See what I mean?

>>16686703
>can't actually identify r*ddit spacing but yells it anyway when he sees space in a statement he disagrees with
Wew lad

>>5298876
>Who is Van Gogh and hundreds of poets

Checkmate dummy.

>>4976073
>side-steps and weasels out of talking about the supposed "WW2 allegory of the Catcher in the Rye"
>Does not provide textual examples of his previous assertions, instead just claims that there is a huge body of work by many authors asserting your baseless assertions
>Appeals to authority
>Lists "great thinkers" thinking that his proximity and familiarity with their works will give him authenticity
>Keirkegaard
>One of the most useless thinkers to ever exist, who was more famous for his hairdoo than any ground breaking ideas, principles, meditations, etc

You really are a kid you know that? A weak little pussy faggot dilettante who likes to hear himself speak, who knows nothing about anything, and who first and for most would like to be respected and regarded as a well read intellectual without actually being a well read intellectual.

You think that spouting something your professor said vaguely one lecture about how "catcher is a WW2 allegory" then being too lazy to pull any articles or hard textual examples affirming the fact is going to make you appear smart in front of your peers?

Guess what faggot, it only makes you look like the biggest faggot that ever faggot.

Consider yourself anally destroyed, you've earned it, faggot.

>>4872102
Nice cherry pick dere buddy.

Also, nice denial of pre-1910 styles of painting this painting obviously embodies.