/lit/ - Literature

>>13053566
Ask me what you want to know about it. It's easie peasie.

I would say read around it first.

Wikipedia / Stanford

What I think is cool in it:
1. A full regard to subjective experience and a reframing of it in a new and involved language. A genuinely complex appreciation of subjective sense of time.
2. Poetic generalization of modes of experience.
3. A honest consideration of anxiety, death, and lived experience
4. A nice analysis of Care, Indeterminacy and Disclosive (affective) Truth as opposed to Informational Truth and calculation
5. An anlysis of Being as a source of Affective Wonder.
6. Talk of Authentic time as opposed to Idle talk (social) time

What I think is ridiculous in it:
1. Disregard for science, caricaturing it as primarily concerned with the ontic. Ontological considerations have to be hinged on the Ontic and on Science.
2. A lack of abstract logical rigour
3. Disregard for how absorbing mundane rules is important for ‘Truer’ disclosive states.
4. Nothing written against a cheap and Manufactured Affectivity

Post a book and thank the country that made it possible.

>Thank you Germany.

Posted this same thread on /int/ yesterday and on /his/ today. Hoping to see what you got /lit/.